Subject:
|
Re: Which weighs more?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 02:53:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
427 times
|
| |
|
|
Nope,
My scale shows:
1x16 regular brick: 6 grams
1x16 Technic beam: 5 grams
Eric Harshbarger
Ross Crawford wrote:
> In lugnet.general, David Simmons writes:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > In my latest project (making a Gunstar) I'm using a lot of 1x16 Technic
> > beams, however there are two where I'm using none of the friction peg holes
> > for anything. Would a regular 1x16 beam weigh less or more? I'm trying to
> > reduce weight wherever possible due to the design of the ship.
>
>
> My guess is the technic beam would probably weigh slightly more.
>
> ROSCO
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Which weighs more?
|
| (...) Amazing!(1) And quite counterintuitive, if you ask me. Volume and surface are not always tightly correlated but the Technic beam has lots more surface area. 1 - I'm assuming you actually weighed 50 of each and did the math or whatever. I have (...) (21 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Which weighs more?
|
| Thanks Eric! :-) Dave "Eric Harshbarger" <eric@ericharshbarger.org> wrote in message news:HB7Es3.6z7@lugnet.com... (...) holes (...) to (...) (21 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.general)
| | | Re: Which weighs more?
|
| (...) Hmmm interesting. My conclusion from that would be that the "cylinder" containing the holes is significantly thinner than the brick walls. ROSCO (21 years ago, 4-Mar-03, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
12 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
