Subject:
|
Re: not *that* odd (was Re: how very odd)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 21:31:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
797 times
|
| |
|
|
richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message
news:H52Hr6.tJ@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.general, Clark Stephens writes:
> > The specific part you mention was added to a normal production run early • in
> > the Fright Knights series. It was probably meant to be used more often.
>
> Don't we have an even more recent example of this occurring in the • Knight's
> Kingdom, #6098 King Leo's Castle? I refer to this element:
> http://peeron.com/inv/parts/30272 the different set numbers refer to the
> same set -- so basically, it has appeared in only one set so far (and if • you
> have ever seen one, you know this is probably a good thing).
True, but hateful though it is it serves a purpose that cannot be done
without modified bricks. You can't get a portcullis grille down a gap 2 wide
including an arch. The wall piece provides no benefit over 2 seperate
corners, lots of which are used in the same model :) I didn't mean so much
its odd that LEGO should produce a piece for just one set, rather they
produce a piece for one set then use it in a way to render it pointless :)
<snip>
> -- Hop-Frog
--
James Stacey
---------
www.minifig.co.uk
#925 - I'm a citizen of Legoland travelling Incommunicado
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | not *that* odd (was Re: how very odd)
|
| (...) Don't we have an even more recent example of this occurring in the Knight's Kingdom, #6098 King Leo's Castle? I refer to this element: (URL) the different set numbers refer to the same set -- so basically, it has appeared in only one set so (...) (22 years ago, 4-Nov-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
