Subject:
|
Re: Lego Supercar II?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 05:40:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1131 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Jim,
I will have to take a closer look, but it is a reasonable price for
inflation and so forth. As for the percentage, I am definitely more
town/space than Technic, but I do use a lot of technic parts and buy a
few of the lesser technic models, it's just one of those things where
you have to allocate time and resources to what you like. My guess would
be, oh, about 40% Technic 60% not? Any other thoughts on this?
Scott Sanburn
Jim Wissner wrote:
>
> Yes, I thought that was actually quite a reasonable price. At least, I guess I
> was expecting it to be more..
>
> Just out of curiousity, what approximately is the breakdown between "technic"
> and "non-technic" AFsOL? I seem to notice there are fewer that are heavily
> into technic than not.. But I have no idea.. Does anyone have a better sense?
> 50/50? 75/25? 60/40?
>
> Jim
>
> Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
> > Wasn't that price around the other black technic car (I don't remember
> > if it was a "Supercar" or not). It doesn't look too bad, especially when
> > you look at what TLG is doing to other model lines.
> >
> > Scott Sanburn
> >
> > Mike Stanley wrote:
> > >
> > > Tom Stangl <toms@netscape.com> wrote:
> > > > $140 from S@H, available Aug/Sept.
> > >
> > > OUCH. Man, am I glad I don't dig Technic.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials
> > > http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/
> > > 800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 (S@H Canada)
> > > www.lugnet.com/news/ - A great new resource for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Lego Supercar II?
|
| Yes, I thought that was actually quite a reasonable price. At least, I guess I was expecting it to be more.. Just out of curiousity, what approximately is the breakdown between "technic" and "non-technic" AFsOL? I seem to notice there are fewer (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.general)
|
16 Messages in This Thread: ![Lego Supercar II? -Han Cho (3-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Simon Denscombe (3-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Tamyra Teed (4-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Tom Stangl (4-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Eric Brok (5-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Tom Stangl (4-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Mike Stanley (5-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Scott Edward Sanburn (5-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Jim Wissner (5-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Larry Pieniazek (5-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Thomas Main (5-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Fredrik Glöckner (5-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Lego Supercar II? -Alex Wetmore (5-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![How many Technic people? (Was Re: Lego Supercar II?) -Robert Farver (5-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: How many Technic people? (Was Re: Lego Supercar II?) -Duane Hess (5-Mar-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|