 | | Re: 2001 rumours —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) I’m going start a rumour right now that we are going to see a non-town orientated train set. The current range has reached the town Jr cul-de-sac – the only way the break out is to go non-town – adventure, or perhaps even *new* space. hmm, was (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | (...) cul-de-sac – (...) even (...) Not unless you count something seen in the far-background of a Cloud City scene in the Special Edition. ~Mark (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Matthew Miller
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm hoping (seems unlikely, unfortunately) that Lego will continue their *own* space line, despite the SW contract. Trains would be a great excuse to do that, in fact. (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | | (...) Trains and Star Wars need to go off in separate directions! Why? Because in Star Wars, everybody is either a hotshot pilot, or employs one. It's like everybody drives a car, and the ones who can't, hang out at spaceports (Mos Eisley) trying to (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | | | | "Erik Olson" <olsone@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:FxD8tx.M55@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) one. (...) spaceports (...) passenger (...) just (...) flying (...) Vader, who (...) dream (...) are (...) Wars (...) Thanks for the insight, Eric! I (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Eric Lanteigne
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Snip (...) I hope that Lego won't licence everything. Lego is not about creating a model and letting it sit there (although that's what most AFOLs are doing, me included). Lego is about building, dismantling and rebuilding. Where goes the (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Yeah, I started those rumors. (: (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Matthew Teets
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I would rather see a rumor about DC and Lego as then maybe a wonder woman set would come out. Just think of all the clear plastic special pieces that might come in an "invisible jet" set. Matt (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | (...) employs one. (...) spaceports (...) Obi Wan and Luke were trying to hire a *fast* ship that would be likely to stay away from official channels, as a spaceliner would likely have gotten them picked up by Imperial Customs. (...) That's a (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Alan Gerber
|
| | | | | (...) Hmm... There was a hover train thing in some game like rouge squadron, but it didn't use tracks, just an American Football goalpost lookin' hoverer thing every coupla' hundred meters. It wouldn't work with the standard track system. Alan (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | | | (...) No it wouldn't work with your existing track, but you would get a nifty anti- gravity generator in every set instead of a regulator. Then you could sell the extra generators to Castle folk for floating castles! (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —John DiRienzo
|
| | | | | | | | "Erik Olson" <olsone@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:FxD7GI.9BL@lugnet.com... (...) but it (...) thing (...) system. (...) anti- (...) the (...) And of course Jabba the Hutt fans could build all the Sail Barges their hearts desire! Have fun! (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Mark Sandlin
|
| | | | | | (...) squadron I think you mean "Rogue Squadron." Rouge Squadron sounds like a Mary Kay saleswoman meeting. ;^) ~Mark (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Nicholas Allan
|
| | | | How about bringing back the Wild West theme with a big Wild West style train, complete with bandits to hold the train up and the proverbial tramp in a cattle/box car? Nicholas Allan "Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | Sounds like a good idea to me. I'd like a cattle car for my train, especially if it had cattle in it! (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Matthew Teets
|
| | | | I hate to start my post with a lame movie as a good theme, but I just got done watching the movie version of "Wild wild West". While watching it I just kept thinking of all the great lego stuff you could build around that. The only negative side of (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | (...) Oh definitely! I'd love to see a technic version of that giant robot spider thing. Ben Roller (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Bradley Dale
|
| | | | | | | Didn't Cyber Slam have a giant Technic spider thing in it? (...) kept (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Ben Roller
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I wouldn't call it giant, but 8266 (Spyder Slayer) has one. It doesn't come close to the size of the one from the movie though. (URL) would be great to see someone put something together, with the RCX perhaps, that could stomp around my (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Jonathan Wilson
|
| | | | | | (...) Dont forget that cool train and that tank thing :) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours —Gary Istok
|
| | | | I love the Wild Wild West theme idea. I used to watch the show on TV all the time (before and after it went to reruns). My favorite LEGO set is #396 - the Thatcher Perkins Locomotive, an 1863 vintage western style train locomotive. (I never met a (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours / western train —Paul Sinasohn
|
| | | | Gary, Isn't 3225 a start in that direction? And there was 726.... BTW, how many large spoked wheels do you have?? Have you redone the 396 in any colors other than the original black/blue/red? I redid mine, substituting grey for red, and would like (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: 2001 rumours / western train —Gary Istok
|
| | | | (...) Hi Paul, I have not yet built a Thatcher Perkins in other colors, but I was mulling it over. I have built a coal tender and old style passenger car in the 1860's style to the Thatcher Perkins scale (using small spoked wheels), but haven't yet (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | colorful western trains —Hao-yang Wang
|
| | | | (...) Photographs for trains in the 19th century are, naturally, all in black and white. From these photographs you can never tell that these western trains were actually so colorful. How/where can you find the colored pictures of these western (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| | | | |
