Subject:
|
Re: more Mindstorms FAQ
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics, lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Jan 1999 07:05:33 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
beaker@pobox.comSPAMCAKE
|
Viewed:
|
123 times
|
| |
|
|
Also sprach Kekoa Proudfoot:
: Then again, this is my opinion, and since I do not plan to directly
: contribute to the FAQ, maybe I should have no say in this.
Opinions are welcome. The best place to post them is the newly-created
lugnet.faq group.
Your specific opinion is agreed with, and will eventually happen,
although possibly not in the initial version. The initial focus will be
on getting a useful document into circulation, and subsequent revisions
(hopefully published quarterly) will see increased diversity. I see an
initial need for at least three documents, one general, one
robotics/programming, and one for trains. Other obvious topics that
should be broken out are probably escaping me, but it is late and I am
very tired:)
/ _ _ / _ _ He who dies with the most toys is nonetheless still dead.
()(-(//((-/
============= Jim Baker -- Weather Weasel Extraordinaire ==============
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: more Mindstorms FAQ
|
| (...) I would be against a single, all-encompassing FAQ, since I would like to be able to access a single document that is the Mindstorms FAQ. I'm not against a database of questions from separate FAQs, however, or the sharing of questions between (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.general)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
