Subject:
|
Re: Fair labeling requirements (was Re: How many bricks are there in a lego set?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 18:14:14 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Troy Cefaratti <mnementh@nacsIHATESPAM.net>
|
Viewed:
|
1915 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote in message
news:389A3C31.DF107DE@voyager.net...
> In the case of TLG products, what actual benefit to consumers is this
> law providing?
>
> All sets with 100 pieces are not somehow fungible, the pieces are
> different from one set design to the next.
>
> As usual, a hard to read law that ultimately is useless.
I kinda like knowing ahead of time how many pieces will be in the set. It
helps me determine if the set is a good deal or not, especially sets on
clearance, or ones that I am not familiar with. (Using a rather subjective
price-to-piece ratio that is dependent on the type/sizes of the pieces and
their value to *ME*)
Also, if said law keeps them from picturing "alternate models" that use
pieces not in the box, this is an additional bonus. I know that I would be
upset of I couldn't build something on the box without having to buy
something else. And would be even more upset if I had to explain to a kid
why he/she can't build something on the box with the pieces in the box.
Troy
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
