General Discussion : 14517


General / 14517	14516 \| 14518

Subject:	Fair labeling requirements (was Re: How many bricks are there in a lego set?)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.general
Date:	Thu, 3 Feb 2000 23:31:23 GMT
Viewed:	1869 times

In lugnet.general, Frank Filz writes: > Can anyone substantiate this law? Can you point to a reference to it on > the web? Ask and ye will receive: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/1453.html Will

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Fair labeling requirements (was Re: How many bricks are there in a lego set?)
(...) Will, you're a genius. When I made my wild claim above, I was pulling the data out of my sleeve. Thanks for your support! -Cheese (25 years ago, 4-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)

		Re: Fair labeling requirements (was Re: How many bricks are there in a lego set?)
In the case of TLG products, what actual benefit to consumers is this law providing? All sets with 100 pieces are not somehow fungible, the pieces are different from one set design to the next. As usual, a hard to read law that ultimately is (...) (25 years ago, 4-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: How many bricks are there in a lego set?
(...) Can anyone substantiate this law? Can you point to a reference to it on the web? I know model kits usually don't give piece counts, and puzzles give only approximate piece counts (your 1000 piece puzzle probably doesn't have exactly 1000 (...) (25 years ago, 3-Feb-00, to lugnet.general)

16 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search