 | | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) I'm on board with them. However my bandwidth just dried up. Can someone take a stab at a repost incorporating Todd's and Steve's changes? Do it as a single block and posters can mark it up again. Don't bother with revision bars, et al, none of (...) (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) It really has been the doing of one individual, believe it or not, as the catalyst (with the help of some regulars of course). Reminds me of the Mandroid days. These too, I suspect, will pass. Barry (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message <3662a9e2.2109338@lu...et.com>... :I think it used to be -- at least we :heard happy stories from time to time -- that people with limited interest :in LEGO would stumble into RTL and then discover how wonderful LEGO & (...) (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | The crux of the matter (IMHO)
|
|
Wow. Wotta thread! I think there has been more traffic on LUGNET on this issue of carrying RTL than on anything since it started. It's nice to see 70 new messages, and NONE of them appear to be flames... When's the last time you recall that (...) (26 years ago, 23-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) Well, one way would be to put a link on various web pages...I'm more than willing to put one on my pages,, such as they are...I am sure there are many folks who appreciate the job you've done in creating LUGNET, and would probably do the same. (...) (26 years ago, 23-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGNET Blurb (was Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) ", so you are sure to find information in your area of interest." (...) Thanks for writing the post. Some advocacy is necessary for encouraging participation. Besides the post could be updated from time to time. (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Don't send them in envelopes (Re: Bring Your Minifig To Work Day)
|
|
(...) A bubble pad envelope is fine, because it is thicker ( greater than a 1/4") and machines can't process it. I know the postage is more, but piece of mind is better. (26 years ago, 1-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
On Mon, 30 Nov 1998 03:53:14 GMT, Paul Foster <pfoster@execpc.com> wrote: :Ok, then what happens if somebody who is approved cross posts to rtl and :a lugnet :group and it propagates out to the web and then someone on the web who :is not :approved (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) One thing to consider is that if a message is cross-posted to a moderated group, it shouldn't show up in any other groups until it's been accepted in that group. LUGnet is a (lightly-and-automatically) moderated forum. It's completely (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
|
(...) True, canceling wouldn't work unless you get control.cancel. Spam aside for a second, I don't think ignoring cancels is very bad. People should assume that once they hit "post", it's public, like it or not. But then, there's the issue of spam (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
