Subject:
|
Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Nov 1998 22:48:57 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.NOSPAMorg
|
Viewed:
|
2702 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> If it just grabs messages from some upstream node and then reoffers them
> like a caching NNRP server, cancels may not work. Matt, is that right?
> Is it a horrible terrible thing if cancels don't work? Do most cancels
> these days arrive before the messages they're cancelling (spam)?
True, canceling wouldn't work unless you get control.cancel. Spam aside for
a second, I don't think ignoring cancels is very bad. People should assume
that once they hit "post", it's public, like it or not. But then, there's
the issue of spam -- there's a lot of it. How would you be getting your RTL
feed? If your upstream provider is relatively clean, you should be okay.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Should RTL be hosted on this server?
|
| (...) By "unwashed" I take it you mean those who haven't completed the news-posting setup? Or do you mean Larry's version of "unwashed"? (...) But doesn't that validate and/or encourage the practice of posting HTML, binaries, spam, etc.? (...) Yes, (...) (26 years ago, 30-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
132 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
