 | | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) Jake has told me, and I believe he's told the group here on LUGNET, that Consumer Affairs *does* track this information and *does* relay it to the appropriate department. But, I suppose that might not be good enough for people who "can never (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for Feedback - focused thread
|
|
(...) In old colors permanently: <4519>, <4515>, <4531>, <4520>, <5305>, <628>, Mosaics unless you want to use the new colors to make 7 color mosaics instead of 5. Parts permanently in old color: (URL) lt. grey, dk grey (URL) lt. grey, dk grey (URL) (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) But telling Consumer Affairs is telling it to a black hole. It does nothing. However, as Jake has noted, TLG employees read Lugnet. So stating it here again....and again...and again {might} finally make it sink in as to how important it is to (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for Feedback - focused thread
|
|
Jake, I think it would be easiest on the company, you, and AFOLs if a Tub List were made up. Then produce that tub in Old Grey/DkGrey/Brown AND in New. Make the external tub color Old Grey for the old colors, and maybe black or New Brown for the New (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) That's it. Tell customer service what you think. As for the rest of us, we already know, cause you've already told us...and told us...and told us. -Tim (22 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) Gil, Rereading my post i find it a bit ironic. It was not my intention. The answer was sincere but the words after the answer were ranting i must admit. (I thought that in this context of "what parts would you like being produced in old (...) (22 years ago, 8-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
And I get equally tired of responses like this one so I suppose we are all just tired. Greg "Rocco J Carello" <rogue27@mac.com> wrote in message news:HxDABH.1FA2@lugnet.com... (...) all (...) new (...) probably why (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
I don't see this as ruining anything. I have read some very interesting posts with the direction this thread has gone. Some things have even given me perspective I had not previously considered. Why should you care, just don't read it! There are (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) Yes, i agree, both of them are very desirable. But they are different sets. And if they made one in *universal* tan surely i would get one too :-) Now, seriously, and with all due respect, i think you missed my point. English is not my native (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
(...) I agree. I get tired of each new thread Jake starts turning into a color complaint. It makes it difficult to enjoy reading a thread. That's probably why I had an edge to the words in my first reply to him. (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Blegend!
|
|
(...) Regardless of their level of skill and expertise, they can and will put the word LEGEND on top of a box if they want to. (...) The change to this set IS minor. This thread is about the new legend, and the slightly changed grey is a minor (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
Wow! How cool! I really liked that set, errrm "Model". I broght 4 of them back in the day. Some of the parts helped me build the Little Blue Bot. Good news, thank you! e (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
Nice choice, Jake! Of course, I already own 3-5 in blue, and 2 in red (I built a Red Fury before *you* guys did!). Make my day - release part 6005 in yellow so I can finally make a Yellow Fury (I KNOW they exist, they were used as fingers on the (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
(...) And the same to you. I was asking Giddens where you had disappeared off to a few weeks ago, and now here you are posting again. Good to hear from you! -Tim (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: We Build For Fun, Right? (was Re: Announcing new legend!)
|
|
(...) It doesn't bug me. If they're only going to stick around to complain, then I'd rather not have to filter through their posts. (...) Yes, I think it's quite extreme. It puzzles me, but it doesn't upset me. To each his own. -Tim (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
(...) Tim, Agreed. Yes, there are some strong arguments on each side (I have yet to voice my concern for it, let alone for parts) but I think we should talk about set concepts and theme issues and sweet MOCs. Also, "Hello to you" as I haven't spoken (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | We Build For Fun, Right? (was Re: Announcing new legend!)
|
|
(...) It was that last sentence that really got me thinking. Some posts I've seen put up about going into a "quasi-dark-age" have just left me uneasy. There is nothing wrong voicing displeasure with what LEGO has done but to take as far as "That's (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new Legend!
|
|
Great news Jake, and thanks for the heads-up! Hopefully there are a few more in the works :) James (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing new legend!
|
|
(...) So when will enough have been said? When the thread reaches 300 posts? 400? 1000? When the change is finally reverted [1]? From reading your posts, I don't think it will _e.ver_ be enough for you. Not even if you get your way in the end, (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego)
|
