| | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
|
|
(...) But not entirely. Some AFOL's might participate in auctions to be theme complete, but others also do it for the parts. Some parts are no longer available at all or in the color I want. (...) It sounds like you work where I do :) We have two (...) (26 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: TLG investigation
|
|
I inquired about bulk parts many years ago and the minimum order was 100 pieces and you had to increment in 100 pieces. The prices they quoted for common bulk bricks was extremely cheap, but specialty pieces were another matter, but considering I (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Jeroen, Please read this. You might be surprised by it.
|
|
(...) pretty much a kid, and I would like to see old sets brought back, and bulk orders made available. I mean, I know lots of kids who would love the old sets brought back, and bulk ordering. If you think that kids would rather have flashy sets (...) (26 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Time Cruiser (6493) Question
|
|
I bought it: in fact it was the first set I bought after my Dark Ages. (I'm sure this says something about me psychologically, but never mind!) It does have some neat stuff - I turned the ship into a rather more realistic looking cog or carrack, and (...) (26 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Time Cruiser (6493) Question
|
|
(...) Shrouds. But since the lego ships frequently have almost no other standing or running rigging, you might as well just call them rigging. Kevin (26 years ago, 21-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: I would like some help, please... (More Dacta in Canada)
|
|
(...) That's an even better idea. (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: I would like some help, please... (More Dacta in Canada)
|
|
(...) Could anyone with a scanner post it some where on the web. There is more than one AFOL in Canada that would like to see all the line of Dacta set. Martin (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
|
|
[This followup was posted to lugnet.general and a copy was sent to the cited author.] Hello Jeroen! Many of the things that I would desire/like to see from TLG have been stated by many in the community, and far more eloquently than I could ever hope (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
|
|
On Sat, 20 Feb 1999 02:46:13 GMT, Tom McDonald uttered the following profundities... (...) An MT set. Say that again. That is what a set with many large, preformed, specialised pieces is! Empty! Uninspiring, lacking in design and function. (Not (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
|
|
[This followup was posted to lugnet.general and a copy was sent to the cited author.] (...) Hello! Introductions and my story first.....(apologies in advance, too, as I tend to have a very disjointed writing style...) I, too, am an AFOL. My first (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: TLG investigation
|
|
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 21:23:18 GMT, Tom Stangl uttered the following profundities... (...) I'll do this. Just send me an e-mail entitled "Black roof bricks." I will post the results in a few days. If someone could tell me the price as well....... (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
|
| | Re: Time Cruiser (6493) Question
|
|
It is OK for parts, it has some nice starter parts if you are into boats (Pirate ships, masts, those brown rope ladder things (Name?)). The train canopy is cool, as well as the gray airplane wings, and it has some great mini-fig accessories. I got (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Time Cruiser (6493) Question
|
|
Has anyone bought the 6493 Flying Time Vessel? I saw these on a clearance for $25 the other day and while I don't care for the model, it looks like a decent source of parts. I would have bought it for $10 but couldn't justify $25. What is the (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Help with Outlook Express please...
|
|
Linc Smith skrev i meddelandet ... (...) of your (...) to. (...) visible (...) go to (...) several more (...) By (...) rather (...) Sometimes I feel like a ... (insert favourite words here) ! The only defense I can think of, is that I'm running the (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
|
|
(...) Yes, yes, yes! I had been griping about this very thing just a few weeks ago on here! I was beginning to think I was alone in that regard. Thanks for speaking up. (wow... that's two things that we've agreed on in one week! This is getting (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Wahoo! I won!
|
|
(...) Good for you! So I guess you're BLISSfully happy? Ha! Couldn't resist.(1) Julie (1) Sorry if that line has been used before by you old timers ;-) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Nunmber of bricks in the LEGO Cowboy?
|
|
There is a LEGO exhibit at a local Wal-Mart featuring a Cowboy on a horse. Anybody know how many bricks are in it? Mike - mike_walsh@mentorg.com (URL) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Help with Outlook Express please...
|
|
(...) more Can't get much better than that :-) -- Steven | svore at mindspring .com | kf4fbk | TC++MS++#15LS+M+HalYB64m (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: TLG investigation 1st answers
|
|
(...) That is probably the case, yes, so long as increasing the set design level meant producing things that adults actually take a widespread liking to. Designing sets that adults enjoy doesn't necessarily mean designing things specifically for (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Wahoo! I won!
|
|
(...) Thanks. :) (...) I played most days, but not all. Maybe 20 of 24. Steve PS. One thing was kind of funny -- there was a letter in the shipping carton. It was just a short note, basically it was, "here are your sets, congratulations." But it was (...) (26 years ago, 20-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
|