 | | Re: New pics from LEGOLAND
|
|
(...) A) What's a rack railway? B) What're the details on the one in Houghton? Did they run it up the side of the MEEM? Nah, then the ROTC's wouldn't have anything to rappel... Steve (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Sets...
|
|
(...) The main SW sets will be out march/april, but the Episode one series models, of which there was a preview in the catalog, will be out july. Or at least, that's what I gathered. Jasper (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Sets...
|
|
(...) It's a bit of confusion on the part of the people who gave you those dates. The /regular/ catalog lists the SW sets as being available at the earlier date. The /direct/ catalog (i.e. Shop@Home) will not have SW until July. Hope that helps. J, (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic 1999
|
|
(...) Well, I would be a fool to insist on this, given only one picture. But if you look closely on the center of the piece, you'll notice that it's just the same as the white dish we had this year. Besides, I think you can see the outline of the (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New pics from LEGOLAND
|
|
(...) Sorry, I spelled the name of the sailing wessel incorrectly. The proper name is "Statsraad Lehmkuhl". Here's a picture of it, for those who are interested: (URL) even has the German harbour in the background, just like the LEGOLand images! (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Contest Ideas?
|
|
(...) The snow fell on The Strip. News broadcasts showed snow in front of Caesars Palace, and the Los Angeles Times had a front page photo of snow in front of the Mirage. Alan (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved
|
|
(...) It would have cost ~$500/month if it had continued at that bandwidth rate. Obviously it would be going down after the 1999 catalogs appear in more stores, but on the other hand it could also have gone up by 5x or more if the readership of (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved
|
|
(...) Ya, me too. I heard offline that this bandwidth bill was not that much scratch, it was just the trendline that was worrisome. Or so the rumor said. (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved
|
|
(...) I've been willing to pay my dues for a while now. :) Especially if I can go ahead and lock in a prime piece of baseplate. (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved
|
|
(...) Wow. All I can say is thanks a bunch for hosting them while you could. Do we need to pass the hat? :-) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New pics from LEGOLAND
|
|
(...) There used to be one of these at Niagara Falls, somewhere, and I rode it when I was about 7 or so. Pretty neat, especially when you get to the middle and the other car passes you. I think there is one in Pittsburgh too. What I like better, (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message <366cc340.28054619@l...et.com>... : :Kevin Loch has graciously agreed to host the JPEG files for the 1999 :catalog. Image links at : : (URL) been updated to point to the new directories on Kevin's server :www.kl.net, so (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Sets...
|
|
These new 1999 sets are nice and all, but I am confused. I thought the Star Wars theme would be out in March/April. Now I am hearing July. What am I missing? Also, when does Shop-at-Home usually start carrying new sets? I don't live anywhere near (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans of 6455 on my Website
|
|
Tom McDonald wrote in message ... (...) future to lego newbies: "The set seems to be >complete as I built everything in the instruction book, but I seem to have lots of pieces left over." Oddly enough, I had a lot of pieces left over from the three (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: More 1999 Catalog Thoughts...
|
|
(...) It is cool. And I just bought one at the B. Dalton bookstore. They have it for 25% off, $14.95 Which considering the size of the book, is still a little high. Guess what my nephew is getting for his birthday? :-) -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic 1999
|
|
(...) You think so? That would suck. I got all excited when I saw those fans. That would make a cool piece. A good specialized piece with a lot of interesting applications. I sure hope you're wrong about this. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Contest Ideas?
|
|
(...) No way! I was based in Vegas from '83 to '90 and I remember it snowing (lightly) at least once. Unless they mean _downtown_ Vegas. I was at NAFB (outskirts of town) -- Terry K -- From Phoenix, where it also snowed (lightly) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
|
(...) Well, hrmm. I see what can go on in .debate as being fundamentally different from even the same discussion going on here or in RTL. People who have no interest in controversial subjects need not see them fill up their general discussion group. (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Legoland Carlsbad Job Fair
|
|
Heard on KNX Newsradio on 4 December 1998 at about 11:15 in Los Angeles: Legoland Carlsbad is holding a Job Fair 13-14 December. Open positions include Food, Security, and other departments. Builders was *not* one of the positions mentioned. The (...) (26 years ago, 8-Dec-98, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sd, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Clearer catalog images of new 1999 sets
|
|
Alan Liu wrote in message ... (...) in (...) after (...) According to Mariam Webster's Deluxe Dictionary (Tenth Collegiate Edition), with all the appropriate TMs: Wizard: adj. 1. archaic: having magical influence or power 2. archaic: of or relating (...) (26 years ago, 8-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
