General Discussion : 1262


General / 1262	1261 \| 1263

Subject:	Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved
Newsgroups:	lugnet.general
Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 1998 04:50:20 GMT
Reply-To:	cjc@newsguy.STOPSPAMcom
Viewed:	1031 times

Larry Pieniazek <lpien@ctp.IWANTNOSPAM.com> wrote: > Todd Lehman wrote: > > > ============== =================== > > 2.375 days 5,084,762,607 bytes > > Wow. All I can say is thanks a bunch for hosting them while you could. > Do we need to pass the hat? :-) I've been willing to pay my dues for a while now. :) Especially if I can go ahead and lock in a prime piece of baseplate. -- Unofficial listing of weekly US Lego Shop at Home phone specials http://www.lugnet.com/lsahs/ (discontinued thru Holiday season) 800-835-4386 (S@H USA) / 800-267-5346 ext 222 (S@H Canada) www.lugnet.com/news/ - Focused discussion groups for LEGO fans worldwide

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved
(...) Ya, me too. I heard offline that this bandwidth bill was not that much scratch, it was just the trendline that was worrisome. Or so the rumor said. (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved
(...) Wow. All I can say is thanks a bunch for hosting them while you could. Do we need to pass the hat? :-) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)

14 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search