Subject:
|
Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Dec 1998 06:01:07 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.iwantnospam&Spamcake&.com
|
Viewed:
|
1074 times
|
| |
|
|
Mike Stanley wrote:
> I've been willing to pay my dues for a while now. :) Especially if I
> can go ahead and lock in a prime piece of baseplate.
Ya, me too. I heard offline that this bandwidth bill was not that much
scratch, it was just the trendline that was worrisome. Or so the rumor
said.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: why the 1999 catalog images have moved
|
| (...) It would have cost ~$500/month if it had continued at that bandwidth rate. Obviously it would be going down after the 1999 catalogs appear in more stores, but on the other hand it could also have gone up by 5x or more if the readership of (...) (26 years ago, 9-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
