 | | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
"Ben Roller" <lugnews@rollerfamily.net> wrote in message news:GrH7ot.Kx9@lugnet.com... (...) Hey Ben - I could not agree more with the things you say here. This is sad. I guess this is what you can expect from a former Nike executive. Next up, LEGO (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | RE: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
I just wanted to add my voice to this. Is there a proper official way to register these complaints/opinions ? Is there a suggestions@lego.com ou complaints@lego.com ? It looks like The LEGO Company (except LEGO-Direct!) is living in a dream world on (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
(...) I think you have to expect this sort of thing with any new management, Nike or otherwise. The new management always wants to "make its mark" on the company, to preserve the illusion that they're actually doing something other than wasting the (...) (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
(...) So Black has similar motives towards TLC as does the average tomcat towards a tree? Frankly, I don't know whether to laugh or cry... -- Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 13-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
(...) Lately I've been using: (URL) fill out their opinion surveys and send feedback through their "Send us a comment" link. It's basically a text box that you fill in and then select a category to send it under. It's not a direct email, but (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
<big snip> (...) While I totally agree with you, I did notice that the Galidor figs have what appears to be technic pins at the shoulders, and a similar joint at the hips. Not that that does much good, I'd just as soon build my own arms and legs (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
"Xcalabur" <Xcalabur@rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:GrJ1Ax.Cs1@lugnet.com... (...) is (...) are (...) altogether. (...) what (...) and (...) A few web sites have an advertising poll on the Galidor figures. Go here for more info: (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
(...) I saw the pins to which you are referring. To my eyes they look a lot like the pins that used to connect the arms of my Six Million Dollar Man action figure back in the 1970's. Am I dating myself? :) I'd be curious to see them up close though. (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | RE: LEGO-Galidor Perspective In L.A. Times Article
|
|
(...) That's a good example of what's continually happening right now with the "new" (un)LEGO sets. It's becoming more and more incompatible with the LEGO System. I know that LEGO still has the common sense to design the new parts with some kind of (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | My Standard Rant about Shameless Ripoffs (was Re: LEGO-Galidor Perspective)
|
|
(...) I've never understood why competing, compatible brands are decried as "shameless ripoffs," when they are in many ways adhering to the perceived true vision of LEGO better than TLC itself--especially when TLC moves steadily farther from that (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
