Subject:
|
Re: Mindstorms Wishlist
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Dec 1999 04:40:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1314 times
|
| |
|
|
Wellnow, whose fault is THAT? TLC's, of course - they should have included the AC
adapter.
Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.dear-lego, Jasper Janssen wrote:
>
> [snipped great ideas about powering mini-RCX's with external battery boxes]
>
> > What do you think?
>
> I agree! Small, modular robotic bits would be better than one big RCX bit.
>
> With the way robotic LEGO creations chew through batteries, I was very
> dissapointed that LEGO removed the external adapter on the RCX 1.5. I'm
> guessing too many kids fried their RCX by hooking it up to any old AC adapter.
>
> Steve
--
Tom Stangl
***http://www.vfaq.com/
***DSM Visual FAQ home
***http://ba.dsm.org/
***SF Bay Area DSMs
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Mindstorms Wishlist
|
| In lugnet.dear-lego, Jasper Janssen wrote: [snipped great ideas about powering mini-RCX's with external battery boxes] (...) I agree! Small, modular robotic bits would be better than one big RCX bit. With the way robotic LEGO creations chew through (...) (25 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
