Subject:
|
Re: Mindstorms Wishlist
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Dec 1999 00:27:02 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.orgSPAMLESS
|
Viewed:
|
3873 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> With the way robotic LEGO creations chew through batteries, I was very
> dissapointed that LEGO removed the external adapter on the RCX 1.5. I'm
> guessing too many kids fried their RCX by hooking it up to any old AC
> adapter.
Y'think? I'm not saying I've tried it, but I seem to remember posts from
some of the electronics experts saying they thought there was circuitry to
deal with a wide range of inputs....
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Mindstorms Wishlist
|
| (...) IIRC, almost anything commonly found in a household short of 110V~ or 220V~or 380V~ should be OK (documented is working up til 24V, IIRC, and after that it blows a replaceable fuse). Jasper (27 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Mindstorms Wishlist
|
| In lugnet.dear-lego, Jasper Janssen wrote: [snipped great ideas about powering mini-RCX's with external battery boxes] (...) I agree! Small, modular robotic bits would be better than one big RCX bit. With the way robotic LEGO creations chew through (...) (27 years ago, 27-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
