 | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | In lugnet.general, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke wrote: SNIP (...) I am going to assume the above is a mistranslation from the original German version. Please correct it so it more properly reads (for example): (...) As it currently reads, the letter (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke
|
| | | | (...) Thanks for this input, Kelly! Of course the authors of the letter had not the intention to speak for all AFOLs. This is in fact a (minor) mistranslation. It will be fixed before the letter is handed out to Jan. Kind Regards, Ben (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | In lugnet.color, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Then not to point this out, but when people sign 'petitions', they are usually under the impression that the petition they sign is the one that is going to be received. By (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | (...) I would suggest cancelling this entire thread, and finalising the wording before re-posting. ROSCO (19 years ago, 18-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Every post has to be requested to be cancelled individually, by the person who posted it. We don't cancel entire threads. Even if the thread originator wants it that way! That's becauase LUGNET I'll certainly be glad to cancel any post I (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | (...) The end of this para should read: "That's because LUGNET doesn't censor." (hit send too early, sorry!) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke
|
| | | | | | (...) Hi David, the CEO will of course get the original German letter, which - by the way - got signed by far more often than this one here. That one is written in our mother tongue and therefor superior in language. Since we would give Lugnetters (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —Scott Lyttle
|
| | | | | | (...) I've got lots of suggestions for how you worded the letter, but my biggest one--if the letter doesn't fit on one page, revise until it is one page. Try to keep your passion for the color change out of the discussion--because it only makes one (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please) —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | (...) I appreciate your addressing this, Ben. Having read earlier drafts, I didn't think the intent was to represent all AFOLs, and wanted to make sure it was addressed. For the record, I personally do not agree with the direction of the letter, but (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-05, to lugnet.color, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| | | | |
