 | | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I would whole-heartedly support the formation of a new website. I haven't understand the huge conflict over what was basically a name since the start. I say go for it, even if Castle World comes back by an act of God. ~Kevin Blocksidge (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Ok time for me to get a say in this. For the two years I’ve been here I surely know you can’t push over the castle world admins, trust me I have tried. I have started up argument and pleaded for new admind (with me as 1). Of course even though (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Bwhahahahaahahah. Oh, that's funny. Tell you what. Talk to Me, Matt G (might be hard to get a hold of) or Christina H. about rights to time. No one may have rights to your time, but if take on a thing like this, you have responsibilites. If (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Oh, the official "last name" adressal? Oooh, were gettin SERIOS here... (...) Nobody should. And nobody should have rights over anyone elses time either. (...) He created it, yeah, and so on. But hes barely posted. Hes lurking. So we should (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) I disagree deeply here. I've talked a bit with anthony, and have read his posts closely. I think he has been working extensively to keep as many people in the mix as possible. Both him and I have been very open about our ideas about CW and (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle World is dead.
|
|
Sava: One of my primary rules for CW is that you do not have any rights to my time. My own laziness is an issue that is being addressed with the new proposal that Pawel and I are working on. Why Pawel? Because it was his baby to begin with. Why not (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Castle World is dead.
|
|
(...) Richard, I'm sorry. This is not going to be a nice post. I've done my best to vent this elsewhere but I will not hold it back any longer. How much more slowly do you wish to go Richard? Look at the Castle World website. The last update was (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
(...) I have an update on the part above. We have access to CW again. Many thanks, as always, to our gracious ozbricks hosts! Blame it on my poor record keeping and my glitchy firewall settings. Who knew?! -- Hop-Frog (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
All: We need to go a little more slowly on this stuff at the moment. There's some background issues that have come up and need to be resolved before moving forward. Whereas I thought the hosting issue was settled, I haven't been able to gain FTP (...) (23 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Nominations for the Castle World Committee
|
|
Matt, I think you are confusing something here. Ben M. mentioned that this committee should cover issues of the CBG. The CBG and CastleWorld are two seperate things. Castle Builders' Guild is an alliance of people interested in making and selling (...) (23 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, FTX)
|
