Subject:
|
Re: skeleton warriors
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sat, 20 Jan 2001 17:42:55 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
508 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Bill Farkas writes:
> I'm gonna have to go with Andrew on this one. I like the idea of helmets and
> armor on a skeleton army, especially if it's a bunch of different types. I
> think it gives them an eerie connection to who or what they were before
> being killed and becoming undead - I see it as more scary actually,
> especially if they're fighting against those who knew them when they were
> alive. It makes it more personal and therefore more terrifying. IMHO.
>
> Bill
I like my skellies with some kind of paraphenalia (ooo, where's my
dictionary), too. Helmets and armor (samurai to give it an exotic look).
The mummy headdresses are a favorite of mine - I snag a few of these during
parts auctions. Anyway, I'm with you on this!
Bruce
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: skeleton warriors
|
| (...) Then again, maybe I'm just saying that because I don't have enough armor and helmets to go around. I have way more skeletons than I have castle troops, so I'd quite quickly run out of gear. I can see both of our points. Maybe next time my (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: skeleton warriors
|
| (...) I'm gonna have to go with Andrew on this one. I like the idea of helmets and armor on a skeleton army, especially if it's a bunch of different types. I think it gives them an eerie connection to who or what they were before being killed and (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jan-01, to lugnet.castle)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
