| |
OK. Something that came out of a recent debate was that there is at least one
person besides me who has decreased activity in lugnet.castle due to the
preponderance of Castle World posts. Therefore, I'd like to propose that
Castle World get it's own group for discussions, which by my logic would make
it lugnet.org.castle.castle-world (although I'm frankly not going to quibble
over the actualy place the group winds up :D).
I think this is definitely called for in that Castle World seems to require a
*lot* of admin/member discussion/debate that really isn't related to Lego
Castle Theme in any intrinsic way, yet are necessary for the Castle World folks
to continue their endeavor (one could argue that they could start a mailing
list or have a message board on the Castle World main website, but I'm assuming
that Lugnet would extend CW the same courtesy as NELUG, GMLTC, et al).
Please understand that I am in no way trying to bash Castle World or say
anything negative about it. I think it's a great idea and it seems to be going
swimmingly. If I had the time and the energy I'd definitely be in on it
myself- and who knows, maybe one day I will be. I'd just like to see
lugnet.castle return to being more about Lego Castle building in general.
Thoughts?
lugnet.castle included for visibility, followups to lugnet.admin.general.
eric
|
|
Message has 7 Replies:
 | | Re: lugnet.org.castle.castle-world?
|
| (...) Agreed, in toto. I read .castle for castle stuff, and for Castle World stuff, and I think they should probably be seperated. Especially while Castle World is still in the early stages, and debates occaisionly rise over how it should be set up (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: lugnet.org.castle.castle-world?
|
| On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Lorbaat (<Fr2Fr3.I5J@lugnet.com>) wrote at 19:06:39 (...) Speaking as possibly the other person, I fully agree with Eric. I haven't been so bold, because I couldn't see anything *wrong* with the CW posts, but they have certainly (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: lugnet.org.castle.castle-world?
|
| (...) Well, my knee jerk reaction is "Definitely!". There have been a LOT of posts on Castle World development and potential concepts, to which there has been a lot of negative feedback-- primarily being that it clutters and bogs down lugnet.castle. (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: lugnet.org.castle.castle-world?
|
| (...) Yah, prolly a wise idea...came up last week too... When grouping and organizing, three main demographics typically com up: 1. Geography/Proximity/etc. 2. Age/Gender/Race/etc. 3. Common interests The .org.* ng hierarchy exists primarily to (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: lugnet.org.castle.castle-world?
|
| (...) Eric, I think this is a great idea, as long as it is very clearly stated that the new group is for administrative discussion of the Castle World project. I think MOCs, etc set in CW still definitely belong in .castle. Discussion of actual (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: lugnet.org.castle.castle-world?
|
| Just what about Castle World isn't castle related??? you want to talk about building.. go to .build, that's what it's for. .Castle is for anything castle related, the front webpage even states: lugnet.castle– LEGO SYSTEM Castle™: products (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.castle)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
