Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.org.castle.castle-world?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 22:32:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
449 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, David Eaton writes:
> [...]
> Anyway, I'm certainly happy to see a lugnet.castle.castleworld group become
> inplimented, but I think it has the potential to die off really fast (within a
> few months). If Todd et all don't mind having a dead group, no problem here!
> But I assume that's part of the consideration of creating a new group-- how
> 'permenant' the group will be.
No objections from me with having a dead group -- it's no drag on the server.
I don't think it would really be dead though -- probably low-traffic at the
worst, not that there's anything wrong with low-traffic if it's focused.
> Otherwise, I would most likely suggest a mailing list for CW... I can look
> into supplying one... I think that would most likely work best for a 'short-
> term' solution...
I'll try to set it up tonight...every lugnet group is also a mailing list,
through the magic gateway. :)
http://www.lugnet.com/news/mail/
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: lugnet.org.castle.castle-world?
|
| (...) Well, my knee jerk reaction is "Definitely!". There have been a LOT of posts on Castle World development and potential concepts, to which there has been a lot of negative feedback-- primarily being that it clutters and bogs down lugnet.castle. (...) (25 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
