 | | Knights' Kingdom figures —Huw Millington
|
| | | Here a couple of pics showing the parts in the KK figures: (URL) the figure itself (URL) I have put to good use, guarding the stock of light grey parts :-) Huw (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Adrian Drake
|
| | | | | (...) Wow! Those parts are a lot less useless looking than they first appeared. Sure, the head, torso, and shield are awfully single-use, but all those hinge parts could prove quite useful indeed. It's nice to see they're not all single pieces like (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Thomas Garrison
|
| | | | | | | (...) Huh? I'm not comprehending "all single pieces like Galidor". Each individual piece is a single piece, but that's somewhat tautological. (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Adrian Drake
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Replace "single piece" with "big ugly piece of crap useless pieces" :) Adrian (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Mike Thorn
|
| | | | | | (...) I agree with Adrian somewhat. I'll be first in line to criticize Galidor and second in line for Bionicle specialty parts (like the masks) but these seem to be half decent. I don't like all the new molds they had to make to put out these parts, (...) (21 years ago, 19-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Douglas R. Clark
|
| | | | | | SNIP (...) I've been thinking about this for awhile. It seems that in the last few years, the number of new molds per year that TLC creates has been consistently rising. For example, for 2004 it looks like they have pretty much phased out most of (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Bryan Wong
|
| | | | | | | (...) Snip! You bring up a lot of good points, Douglas. Although others have asked me "Don't you have enough LEGO?" before, I never gave that question a serious thought until now. It's because a) there's a cool new set, or b) like you said, I don't (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | | | "Douglas R. Clark" <drclark@cinenet.net> wrote in message news:Hq638w.12pI@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) years, (...) rising. (...) of the (...) [ ... snipped ... ] Which is really unfortunate because the click hinges are a far (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Frank Kopanitsanos
|
| | | | | | | (...) I bet the Mecha builders are already drooling over (...) As a mecha builder, i can say my mouth is indeed quite saliva-less :) Sure the new parts might be great for making strong and compact joints, but that takes the fun (and skill) out of (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Allister McLaren
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Why should the new joints do that any more than any other of the joints that have been released over the years? I for one am looking forward to getting my hands on some of those new joints, but I reject the assumption that any use I might put (...) (21 years ago, 22-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Frank Kopanitsanos
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Well first, i am DEFINATELY not a master of mecha, in fact, i am quite far from it :) Your post has humbled me, it might just be my frustration in only being able to use technic ball joints and slizer arm joints in my mocs that has caused my (...) (21 years ago, 22-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | | | In lugnet.castle, Douglas R. Clark wrote: SNIP (...) Cost of new mold divided by number of parts needed equals reality check. TLC needed far more Chewies than they need cypress trees (or monorail track) despite what the AFOL community might feel. My (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Johannes Koehler
|
| | | | | | Hello! (...) If TLC still made "friendly" sets they would need tons of (cypress) trees. They used to add one or more trees to almost every building (houses, police departments, gas stations) in the old days. Those many trees (and flowers) made the (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Joe Franco
|
| | | | (...) My bet: I'll give it five months before I see it next to the Galidor sets at 75% off in Toys R Us. :P (21 years ago, 20-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Knights' Kingdom figures —Mark Neumann
|
| | | | (...) Cha! Hope so, I'd like to get a nice stockpile of those arms and leg bits. Hmmmm, mechalicious. Snow Daddy (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
