 | | Payback time —Cary Clark
|
| | | I'd like to thank all of the people that helped me put together the Castle FAQ. As promised, each submission is worth one Castle-like minifig. Here are some of your choices: (URL) course, you'll get an entire fig, and you can request any combination (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Payback time —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | In lugnet.castle, Cary Clark writes: <snip> WOW! I love how graphical it is. Very nice work. (...) It would be neat if you could somehow arrange to take a picture of all the figs (and their new larger sized friends) that you gave out at (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Payback time —John Henry Kruer
|
| | | | | (...) Darn! I didn't know that existed. Oh well... John Kruer (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Payback time —Cary Clark
|
| | | | | | (...) ... (...) Which? That there was a FAQ? That there was a Castle FAQ in the works? That you could contribute to it and get minifigs? Here's one of the original posts about that: (URL) the way, this statement isn't right: (...) The responders who (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Payback time —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | | We really should be the ones sendin’ you our minifigs! For you did such a spectacular job!!! Many thanks on behalf of the entire 'Castle-Community' for all your work. The complete FAQ list is really inclusive and provides a wealth of information. (...) (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Payback time —Pawel Nazarewicz
|
| | | | | (...) compact space - I learned quite a few new things looking at it again :) -- Pawel (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Payback time —Shiri Dori
|
| | | | | (...) great piece of work, and thanks for your continuing effort with LUGNET's FAQ! Your dedication surpasses 99.99999% of the people. :-) Take care, -Shiri P.S. Hmm, I guess I qualify for a minifig! Cool! (23 years ago, 9-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Payback time —Kevin Hall
|
| | | | | (...) Cary.... This info is great... mind if I ad this to my links section of my website? I tried to email you, but I keep getting my emails back?? Anyway, if you want, there are some castle reference info and websites in my Links section of my (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —David Carriker
|
| | | | | To anyone that might know, Why are sets like BFF and Kings Castle grouped with the Yellow Castle, Knights Procession, and Tournament, and called "Classic"? While I agree that they are all great sets, IMO only the latter three qualify as "Classic" (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | (...) I suspect they're classified that way because they aren't released under a specific subtheme, like some of the later sets, they are just under the general "Legoland Castle" group. I agree that some of them would thematically fit under (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | | (...) I looked under the Lugnet database for Black Falcons, but I only came up to one result, that being the black falcon's fortress. Can anyone tell me what's up with this? Don't sets like King's Castle and Catapult also fit under this theme, if (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —Jeff Stembel
|
| | | | | | (...) Lugnet categorizes based on the official subthemes. Since the Yellow Castle, King's Castle, Knight's Castle, and other early sets have no official subtheme, they fall under "classic." (...) See above. (...) Again, when the database was (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —Erik Gustafson
|
| | | | | | (...) If you look deeper into it you actually find a LUGNET category named Black Falcons including just one set, the 6018 Battle Dragon released in 1990. I looked through the BrickShelf scan library from 1990 and this 6018 was the only model with a (...) (23 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | | | In lugnet.castle, Erik Gustafson writes: [snip] (...) Confusing?! Of course, I don't think the Lugnet Admin intentionally organized the earlier sets into the themes to confuse members, but I think there was a lack of logic in doing this. I mean, who (...) (23 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | (...) You raise a very interesting point. Some things I see looking at 1989, 1990, and 1991 catalogs: - Based on my 1991 US catalog, "Crusaders" should simply be "Castle" - Based on the 1989 EU catalog on Brickshelf, 6066 should be "Legoland Castle" (...) (23 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —Magnus Lauglo
|
| | | | | | | | I don't think the Black Falcons and crusaders really fit in "classic" castle, despite how they may have been classified by lego. But there may be complications when it comes to classifying sets which have two factions represented quite equally, such (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —Aaron Dalan
|
| | | | | | | | (...) It's clear that Lego no longer organizes Castle system sets the way it used to. Since the early 90's, rather than having various castle sets under the broad category of 'Legoland Castle,' Lego began to emphasize the different types of factions (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —David Carriker
|
| | | | | | | | I do not believe that Lego ever had an organized database of sets. Otherwise, why would we ever see multiple different sets released with the same number? While it does seem that Lego has some sort of organization in effect for more recent sets, (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I think Lugnet has two goals: 1. provide as much information as possible on LEGO itself 2. be a center of information for fans The first goal requires that the data base accurately reflect any categorizations which LEGO has made. The second (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —Matt Hein
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Hmm..that makes a lot of sense there. When browsing the database for the 1462 treasure cart, I came up to about three results, each ofthem being a sameset, savefor thenumber...isn't there a more feasible way to organize these, because this (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Correct (AFAIK). btw, I have a number of their "product structure" diagrams from different years. It'd probably be useful if those were all displayed on a single page somewhere. I've seen a set change its catagorization from one year to the (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —Bruce Hietbrink
|
| | | | | | | | (...) How about two categories: "sets I have" and "sets I want". :) Bruce (23 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Sign up for a membership, and you can do that. <grin> James (23 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time) —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) You raise a very interesting point. Some things I see looking at 1989, 1990, and 1991 catalogs: - Based on my 1991 US catalog, "Crusaders" should simply be "Castle" - Based on the 1989 EU catalog on Brickshelf, 6066 should be "Legoland Castle" (...) (23 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Payback time —John P. Henderson
|
| | | | (...) offer to provide mini-figs, and I hadn't intended some of my posts to be used for such. But I love it nonetheless! Thanks for all your efforts and all the input from others! -Hendo (23 years ago, 11-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
| | | | |
