Subject:
|
Re: Themes (was: Payback time)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Sat, 11 May 2002 09:03:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
568 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, Jeff Stembel writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Matt Hein writes:
> > I looked under the Lugnet database for Black Falcons, but I only
> > came up to one result, that being the black falcon's fortress. Can anyone
> > tell me what's up with this? Don't sets like King's Castle and Catapult
> > also fit under this theme, if they indeed, contain black falcon figures, and
> > their signature designs?
>
> Lugnet categorizes based on the official subthemes. Since the Yellow Castle,
> King's Castle, Knight's Castle, and other early sets have no official subtheme,
> they fall under "classic."
>
> > Hmm...this has just been another question that always
> > seems to go unanswered. Who exactly got the idea to include
> > crusader, Black Falcon sets, etc, in classic? A bit confusing...
>
> See above.
>
> > All the same, I think a more "to the point" organization is
> > needed for these themes, regardless of what the original
> > packing was. (no, I'm not saying to include a wolfpack set in
> > with dark forest, if it includes a robber, but what I'm saying
> > here is to get a more punctual organization. I don't exactly
> > mean to be a bother to this, but this seems like a good idea...)
>
> Again, when the database was created, it was decided to categorize based on the
> official subthemes. It is a perfectly logical way of doing it.
>
> Jeff
If you look deeper into it you actually find a LUGNET category named Black
Falcons including just one set, the 6018 Battle Dragon released in 1990. I
looked through the BrickShelf scan library from 1990 and this 6018 was the
only model with a BF(except a minifig pack and 6059 Knights Stronghold). I
think the listing is confusing, I don't think Lego releases 6018 as a
subtheme. So the listing in LUGNET must be wrong, lets remake it and split
crusaders, classic castle and BF apart.
Erik Gustafson
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time)
|
| In lugnet.castle, Erik Gustafson writes: [snip] (...) Confusing?! Of course, I don't think the Lugnet Admin intentionally organized the earlier sets into the themes to confuse members, but I think there was a lack of logic in doing this. I mean, who (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
| | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time)
|
| (...) You raise a very interesting point. Some things I see looking at 1989, 1990, and 1991 catalogs: - Based on my 1991 US catalog, "Crusaders" should simply be "Castle" - Based on the 1989 EU catalog on Brickshelf, 6066 should be "Legoland Castle" (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
| | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time)
|
| (...) You raise a very interesting point. Some things I see looking at 1989, 1990, and 1991 catalogs: - Based on my 1991 US catalog, "Crusaders" should simply be "Castle" - Based on the 1989 EU catalog on Brickshelf, 6066 should be "Legoland Castle" (...) (22 years ago, 12-May-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Themes (was: Payback time)
|
| (...) Lugnet categorizes based on the official subthemes. Since the Yellow Castle, King's Castle, Knight's Castle, and other early sets have no official subtheme, they fall under "classic." (...) See above. (...) Again, when the database was (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
