Subject:
|
Re: Themes (was: Payback time)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Fri, 10 May 2002 22:20:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
480 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.castle, James Brown writes:
> In lugnet.castle, David Carriker writes:
> > To anyone that might know,
> >
> > Why are sets like BFF and Kings Castle grouped with the Yellow Castle,
> > Knights Procession, and Tournament, and called "Classic"?
> >
> > While I agree that they are all great sets, IMO only the latter three
> > qualify as "Classic" Lego Castle. The others ARE old and great, but seem
> > better grouped with sets like the Forestmen, and definetly with the
> > "Crusaders" as specified in Cary's FAQ:
> >
> > >
> > > http://www.lugnet.com/~330/FAQ/Castle/
> >
> >
> > It seems that these newer style (compared to the Yellow Castle) sets (anyone
> > with pre-fab castle walls and horses), would be more logically grouped into
> > "Black Falcons" and "Crusaders" (or even "King's Men").
> >
> > I know that this hardly even qualifies as a minor issue, but it has been
> > something that didn't make much sense to me, ever since I found LUGNET and
> > the online lego community (about 2 1/2 years ago). I look forward to
> > hearing your opinions.
>
> I suspect they're classified that way because they aren't released under a
> specific subtheme, like some of the later sets, they are just under the
> general "Legoland Castle" group. I agree that some of them would
> thematically fit under Crusaders and Black Falcons, though.
>
> $0.02
>
> James
I looked under the Lugnet database for Black Falcons, but I only
came up to one result, that being the black falcon's fortress. Can anyone
tell me what's up with this? Don't sets like King's Castle and Catapult
also fit under this theme, if they indeed, contain black falcon figures, and
their signature designs?
Hmm...this has just been another question that always
seems to go unanswered. Who exactly got the idea to include
crusader, Black Falcon sets, etc, in classic? A bit confusing...
All the same, I think a more "to the point" organization is
needed for these themes, regardless of what the original
packing was. (no, I'm not saying to include a wolfpack set in
with dark forest, if it includes a robber, but what I'm saying
here is to get a more punctual organization. I don't exactly
mean to be a bother to this, but this seems like a good idea...)
Anyway, IMO, I would like to hear what anyone else has to
say on this issue.
Just my two brickz...
<<_Matt Hein_>>
Lugnet No. 1112
Pyrokid17@hotmail.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Themes (was: Payback time)
|
| (...) Lugnet categorizes based on the official subthemes. Since the Yellow Castle, King's Castle, Knight's Castle, and other early sets have no official subtheme, they fall under "classic." (...) See above. (...) Again, when the database was (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Themes (was: Payback time)
|
| (...) I suspect they're classified that way because they aren't released under a specific subtheme, like some of the later sets, they are just under the general "Legoland Castle" group. I agree that some of them would thematically fit under (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
