To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 1071
    Leo's castle-- number mix up? —David Eaton
   An oddity- I was putting away my instructions for my new 2000 sets when I noticed something VERY bizarre! I usually put my instructions in order, so I was putting my Leo's Castle instructions away-- and thinking all this time that it was 6091, I got (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
   
        Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up? —John DiRienzo
      Thanks for pointing it out. I kept thinking it was 6098, because thats what the instructions said. I didn't really pay attention to the box. Mismatched numbers. Wonder how long it will take them to figure that out?! If they read Lugnet, like they (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
    
         Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up? —David Eaton
      (...) I think I'd "prefer" 6098... The catalog lists it as 6091, as does the box... and I THINK when the 2000 sets were listed on TLC's site it was listed as 6091... but who knows... Maybe they got some sense when they were printing up the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
    
         Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up? —Jeff Johnston
     (...) Wow. That's *two* errors in the new Castle sets box printing. The other one is on the 6095 Royal Joust, which has the Portuguese name for 'Guarded Treasury' instead of the correct one. Bizarre. I wonder what happened? I wonder if LEGO changed (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
    
         Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up? —Jeff Thompson
      (...) I hadn't even noticed the set numbers. That's really messed up (in terms of LEGO's old habit of numbering similarly sized sets together in the same xxxy range. For example, you could expact that the entire 608x range would be somewhat similar (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
    
         Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up? —John DiRienzo
     Jeff Johnston wrote in message <385EB4D4.3F594E48@m...ne.net>... (...) thats (...) out?! (...) one (...) flip-up (...) done (...) I, too, am beginning to wonder a lot of things. I have a pic of King Leo's Castle that I guess I'm not supposed to (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
   
        Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up? —Aaron West
   (...) Knight's (...) it... (...) Hey there! Good use of a baseplate!!! I am still waiting for King Leo's Castle to arrive in the south, I was going to combine it with my two 6090s and various other castle parts (love them spiral staircases!) and use (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
   
        Re: Leo's castle-- number mix up? —John DiRienzo
   Aaron West wrote in message ... (...) that it (...) 6098! I (...) all (...) 6098! (...) any (...) fact (...) to (...) going (...) instructions) (...) have (...) sinister! (...) and (...) I am guessing there will be a mini-fig pack next year, as well (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
 

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR