Subject:
|
Re: 2000 castle sucks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.castle
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 14:36:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
442 times
|
| |
|
|
I humbly disagree with you Jonathan(1). I am glad that Castle is back
(in grey). Some of the parts do suck, but some of the parts are terrific!
Same as any other year. Personally, I think 91 Castle sucked, but not this
forthcoming year. Not at all.
1 - Surprise, surprise.
Have fun!
John
My Trade/Sale (and links) Page
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego
my weird Lego site:
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/
John DiRienzo
36 Vershire Court
Saint Louis, MO 63135
USA
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Wilson <wilsonj@xoommail.com>
Newsgroups: lugnet.castle
Date: Thursday, December 16, 1999 9:51 PM
Subject: 2000 castle sucks
From what I know of it 2000 castle sucks overall.
It has several poops like that arch piece. The new castle tower pieces
are also crap. Castle has become juniorised.
--
Jonathan Wilson
wilsonj@xoommail.com
http://members.xoom.com/wilsonj/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | 2000 castle sucks
|
| From what I know of it 2000 castle sucks overall. It has several poops like that arch piece. The new castle tower pieces are also crap. Castle has become juniorised. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
