To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 1021
1020  |  1022
Subject: 
Re: 2000 castle sucks
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 01:56:17 GMT
Viewed: 
427 times
  
Jonathan Wilson wrote:

From what I know of it 2000 castle sucks overall.
It has several poops like that arch piece. The new castle tower pieces
are also crap. Castle has become juniorised.

Yeah, but what about the turret tops?  They've reverted to building them
up out of steep-slope bricks, while there is definitely a mould in
existence for a POOP that's been used before (if only in red).

best,

LFB



Message is in Reply To:
  2000 castle sucks
 
From what I know of it 2000 castle sucks overall. It has several poops like that arch piece. The new castle tower pieces are also crap. Castle has become juniorised. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)

17 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR