To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.castleOpen lugnet.castle in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Castle / 1021
1020  |  1022
Subject: 
Re: 2000 castle sucks
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.castle
Date: 
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 01:56:17 GMT
Viewed: 
1950 times
  
Jonathan Wilson wrote:

> From what I know of it 2000 castle sucks overall.
> It has several poops like that arch piece. The new castle tower pieces
> are also crap. Castle has become juniorised.

Yeah, but what about the turret tops?  They've reverted to building them
up out of steep-slope bricks, while there is definitely a mould in
existence for a POOP that's been used before (if only in red).

best,

LFB



Message is in Reply To:
  2000 castle sucks
 
From what I know of it 2000 castle sucks overall. It has several poops like that arch piece. The new castle tower pieces are also crap. Castle has become juniorised. -- Jonathan Wilson wilsonj@xoommail.com (URL) (27 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)

17 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR