Subject:
|
Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.ray
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Oct 2004 10:26:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4006 times
|
| |
|
|
"Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com> wrote in message
news:I4vn98.21q3@lugnet.com...
>
> Most (all?) of Jan's renderings on the posted Brickshelf link don't have
> antialiasing at all, so it's obvious what's causing the seam problem • there.
> However, the forklift done with Nico's setting definitely has antialiasing
> (presumably adaptive POV antialiasing), and the seams still look bad. I'm • sure
> if he did as you suggest, the problem would go away. (I'm guessing you've • made
> extensive use of this technique yourself, given some of the truly • spectacular
> renderings you've posted.)
>
> --Travis
I have used the anti-aliasing quite extensively, although just by using the
defaults I've never had any real problems I can remember, which is why I am
confused by the results on this thread. Maybe it is the LGEO thing, although
I am sure I don't always use LGEO. I recall that some tweaking of the
adaptive parameters can bring benefits, and also I had to remove the jitter
option, which created unpleasant effects at times.
Jennifer
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Radiosity example (F1 Ferrari) once again
|
| (...) After looking closely at the forklift image, I think the stair-step effect is happening due to POV-Ray's adaptive antialiasing algorithm. It's much quicker to render the image at the desired resolution with adaptive antialiasing enabled in POV (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
