 | | Re: The Minifig Macro - walk that minifig
|
|
(...) Hmmm... assuming that all the parts eventually get wound correctly, it would be nice if L3P did this automatically. It would then be possible to do CSG operations on models. (19 years ago, 5-Jun-05, to lugnet.animation, lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: 10170 Instructions?
|
|
In lugnet.trains, John Neal wrote: Crossposting to .cad tree I've seen the new 10170 rendered in ldraw, and the (URL) parts list>, but am wondering if anybody has posted an ldraw file of the set yet and if so, where that might be. TIA, JOHN -Orion (19 years ago, 4-Jun-05, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.cad.dat.models, lugnet.cad.dat.models.sets, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Transparent parts in LDView using LPub
|
|
(...) It's not a good solution, but if you turn off transparency sorting, the problem will probably go away. (The reason it's not a good solution is that other artifacts will likely be visible then.) I'll investigate. I don't see this in the UI (...) (19 years ago, 23-May-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Transparent parts in LDView using LPub
|
|
Hi all, Is there some way to get this (URL) better? I mean without the triangles. I think this question has already been answered, but I cannot seem to find the right post... Thanks. Jaco. (19 years ago, 23-May-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Set 8652 Render
|
|
(...) when you get it prepared can you send it to tburger34@adelphia.net? (19 years ago, 29-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Set 8652 Render
|
|
(...) How did this post slip under my radar? Sorry for the delay in replying. Anyway, yes I will share the MPD. Give me a week (I promise). -Orion (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Set 8652 Render
|
|
(...) Any chance you can share the DAT files? (19 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) I'd be willing to look at a beta version. I'm even happy to look at code (assuming its in something I know) if you like. Tim (19 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) That all sounds perfect. I really like the idea of L3Begin.inc and L3End.inc as well. I think that is a brilliant solution. As for the inline/not-inline option, for L3Begin, L3End and L3Colours I think it should default to inline but be (...) (19 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) I would think if any "system-wide" or "shared" files are included they should by default be inlined, as any changes would affect (maybe deterimentally) previous renders. Any project-specific files I create always get saved locally, so I see no (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) I'd be willing to try and give it a go. I'm still working on a new front end to it (allows automation and a few other things specified in the draw file itself) The current build is at: (URL) Dean Earley, Dee (dean@earlsoft.co.uk) irc: (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) Sure, I already had you and a few others in mind, exactly because I'm aware of your "dissection" and others heavy color redefinition. But if anyone else is ready to spend some time with a beta, and give some feedback, please send me a mail. (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) There will be the following include file options: -ib<file> include file at beginning of POV file -ic[<file>] no camera, optional include file -il[<file>] no lights, optional include file -ie<file> include file at end of POV file But are you (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
In lugnet.cad.ray, Lars C. Hassing wrote: <snip> (...) Hi Lars, Before you release, would it be possible for me to have an advanced copy of L3P, so I can adjust LPub to handle the new format? LPub does post processing of the L3P generated POV file (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) That is excellent news! I missed the first post (ref'd above) but that is exactly what I meant. Would it be possible to include a file in the directory with a name like L3Colours.inc or something that declares any modified colours one wishes (...) (19 years ago, 13-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) You'll be happy to know that the coming L3P (yes, I know I've said that too often) has #ifndef's around everything, e.g.: //// Primitive stud.dat #ifndef (stud_dot_dat) #macro stud_dot_dat(L3ArgTe...,L3ArgMat) L3MacroBegin("stud_dot_dat") #if (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Raytracing a primarily black model
|
|
OK, you did that on purpose! Given the title of the folder, I've gotta ask - What Magazine? (great renders, btw) James Wilson Dallas, TX (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) You got it. 0 L3P IFPOV meta-statements are probably the way to accomplish what you want. Hmm, thinking more about it (I could just go try it), you'll probably still need l3p's -p parameter, or l3p probably won't even look at the primitive (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) Sorry! I guess I didn't make my question clear enough. I'd like to substitute the primitives still, but with those of my own creation, rather than those that L3P creates. For example I think a stud looks better with a slightly rounded top (a (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: L3P Options?
|
|
(...) Yep. -p Don't substitute any primitives in the P directory with POV equivalents ---...--- In order to have a nicer looking image some parts (primitives) in the P directory are by default substituted with POV equivalents. E.g. 4-4cyli.dat is (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
