Subject:
|
Re: New version of MLCad command spec
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.mlcad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 8 Aug 2002 15:50:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3075 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Michael Lachmann wrote:
> "Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:ote2lu87meh0ltvf8ho06dm7t25g95uhga@4ax.com...
> >
> > This is an improvement, I think. However, the requirement for authors
> > to clearly document what (parts) of your meta-commands they've
> > implemented contradicts the restriction from reproducing your document
> > or its contents.
>
> Maybe it's not written in the right way ... what I ment was that developers
> should make clear that if they are not 100% mlcad compatible from the
> language point of view, than they should leave somewhere a note - visible to
> the end-user - which states which commands have not been implemented.
> Otherwice people might be confused by the available things.
> Later on I guess software will be compatible to a certain version of MLCad.
>
> >
> > There are still basic issues with the idea of you claiming IP rights on
> > the language-fragments that need to be worked out.
>
> What do you mean?
My understanding is that because of the ... enthusiastic ... IP laws in
Austria / Germany, your claim of IP rights on the design of part of the
content of DAT files, any lawyer could, on their own volition, come
after ldraw.org if any of your commands made their way into the parts
library, or into content on the site.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New version of MLCad command spec
|
| Ahhh, this license is ment for developers of programms only , not for autoring parts!!!!! I've to corret that in the document. For sure the use of this commands in parts is totally free and open to use ... Michael "Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> (...) (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New version of MLCad command spec
|
| "Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:ote2lu87meh0ltv...4ax.com... (...) Maybe it's not written in the right way ... what I ment was that developers should make clear that if they are not 100% mlcad compatible from the language (...) (22 years ago, 8-Aug-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
