Subject:
|
Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 15 Jul 1999 01:34:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3525 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Tim Courtney writes:
> [...]
> Good point. But with the zip files we need adequate documentation telling
> the user what directories to create to unzip it to. Because it needs to
> wind up in
>
> sets/XXXXZ-YY/
>
> to work the way we intend.
Nah, why go through all that work? -- just embed the directory name into the
zipfile. I'm a bit rusty on pkzip (I use tar these days) but essentially:
pkzip xxxxz-yy.zip sets\xxxxz-yy\*.*
which is analagous to
tar -cvf xxxxz-yy.tar sets/xxxxz-yy
gzip xxxxz-yy.tar
> [...]
> But will people add that?
No, they might not...so that's why it might be good to add it automatically
instead, presuming that they've agreed to place it under OPL.
> And also, is that too much to have on a header
> of each submodel? Or would it be a comment in the mpd? It looks good (and
> I can see it was pasted from the OPL site), but it would make the model
> files rather bulky. I would say that it should go below the OMR header...
Probably doesn't really matter where it goes -- just so long as it appears
somewhere in each file, right? Somewhere near the top is most traditional.
Under the other headers is probably fine?
> > > Well, would it be possible to consider links back to the OMR once it
> > > is up and running?
> >
> > Oh, definitely...I think that would be very helpful to people.
>
> I'll work on getting images ready for that once I get some other pages
> buttoned down.
(Images?)
> Another thing of much importance is the display of the model entries for
> download on the OMR download page. I have thought of different methods and
> haven't come up with the best one yet. We need to categorize it by theme
> and subtheme. Is it overdoing it to make directories and pages for each
> theme and subtheme? [...]
I don't it's overdoing it, but that's just me. Heck, I'm planning for
there to be at least a couple hundred pages for subthemes on the LUGNET
when the sets DB is reshuffled around. Initially there will only be
newsgroups in the lugnet.lego.* hierarchy for the "product programmes"
(i.e. DUPLO, PRIMO, LEGO SYSTEM, TECHNIC, etc.) and "systems" (i.e. Space,
Castle, Wild West, etc.), but there's always plenty of room for non-ng-based
"theme" sub-pages (i.e. Tech Play, Blacktron, Forestmen, DUPLO Zoo, etc.).
Someday might even be ng's for some of the themes, depending on interest.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Storage and Display of OMR Files
|
| (...) [...] (...) Nifty-poos. (...) Hmm... it could be more organized nixing the models.sets, but then again the discussion on each subgroup would be pretty minimal that a main group would be almost necessary to keep discussion going. We could of (...) (27 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
