Subject:
|
ASSOCIATE (was: Re: Renaming of 2916.dat)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 14:44:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
425 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
> I think we have to play some tricks (or cheat for the sake
> of "user friendliness") to have them show up together. It
> seems like it is time to suggest a new field for the part
> file heads; "ASSOCIATE". It should be used by editors to
> automatically show the parts listed in the "ASSOCIATE" field
> of a part, so it is easier for the user to find parts
> relevant to the last most recently inserted part.
Hmm. Interesting idea.
So part 3937 <http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/3937> might have an entry
like:
0 ASSOCIATE 3938 6134
and part 3938 <http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/3938> might have:
0 ASSOCIATE 3937 2440
(of course, these examples capture information that otherwise might be
captured by a connectivity db).
This sounds promising. What do other people think?
Steve
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: ASSOCIATE (was: Re: Renaming of 2916.dat)
|
| (...) WAY better than using naming to overload. 2916 and 2917 get at best a very weak association if they have train in their name. With the ASSOCIATE keyword extension it becomes quite explicit what their connection is. (and parts can also have (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
| (...) It might. (...) I can see your point. And I must admit that the first category I would search for this part under would be "Train". - Which certainly implies that "train" at least should be a keyword for the part. (...) Sort of. In principle (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
