Subject:
|
Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 22:53:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
440 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> This is in my view not at all analogous to Technic or Minifig which are
> broad and useful distinguishing characterizations.
Good point. I looked over all the parts in MLCad w/ the Train designator
and found that, barring the parts previously mentioned and possibly the
track parts, most of them don't even belong in that category (e.g. the doors
and windows)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
| (...) Train in my view is a very narrow group. There are a very few parts that belong in it. I would refer you to the PNLTC originated "diagram of train parts" that many train clubs use to discuss how easy it is to actually get started in trains. (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
