Subject:
|
Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 02:02:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
388 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Robert M. Rodinsky writes:
> > I would like to object on the strongest terms possible the "Modified part
> > description" of the part 2916.dat. This is in keeping with my beliefs on how
> > parts should be named. Please refer to:
> >
> > http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/org/ldraw/?n=1605
> >
> > and
> >
> > http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dev/org/ldraw/?n=1608
> >
> > This is not necessarily a train part.
>
> I agree (obviously since you referenced my post as your second ref)!
>
> >
> > Is this file not my intellectual property? Shouldn't I have some control of
> > its contents?
>
> I disagree.
>
> Author parts for love, not because you want to have ultimate control over
> their fate for ever and ever.
It is not my intention to control the fate of this part forever and ever.
But to have some input as to how it is categorized and where it ends up in
the parts list.
>
> IMHO anyway.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
| (...) I agree (obviously since you referenced my post as your second ref)! (...) I disagree. That's not the intent. The license that is contemplated to be in effect does not let you as the author prevent people from submitting revisions to parts (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
