Subject:
|
Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:25:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
394 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote:
> In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Robert M. Rodinsky wrote:
> True, but I feel this part might fall under Larry's "terribly unwieldy"
> escape clause. Even if he doesn't think so.
It might.
> Anyway... I'm not convinced that
> Wedge Brick 4 x 6 x 2 & 2/3
> is a better (ie, more useful) name than
> Train Front Wedge 4 x 6 x 2 & 2/3
I can see your point. And I must admit that the first
category I would search for this part under would be
"Train". - Which certainly implies that "train" at least
should be a keyword for the part.
> But there seems to be a number of people opposed to the placement of
> this part in Train. Do Larry and Jacob agree this part should be in
> Wedge?
Sort of. In principle (can you write that in English?) it
should be in the "Wedge" category. But since I know that it
isn't the first place I would search for it myself, I am
open to place it elsewhere (read: in the "Train" category).
> I'd like 2917 and 2916 to be categorized together, since they are often
> used together. But I can guess it's not going to happen.
I think we have to play some tricks (or cheat for the sake
of "user friendliness") to have them show up together. It
seems like it is time to suggest a new field for the part
file heads; "ASSOCIATE". It should be used by editors to
automatically show the parts listed in the "ASSOCIATE" field
of a part, so it is easier for the user to find parts
relevant to the last most recently inserted part.
Play well,
Jacob
--
Formula One Racers (with building instructions):
http://jacob.sparre.dk/LEGO/Transport/Biler/Formel-1/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | ASSOCIATE (was: Re: Renaming of 2916.dat)
|
| (...) Hmm. Interesting idea. So part 3937 (URL) might have an entry like: 0 ASSOCIATE 3938 6134 and part 3938 (URL) might have: 0 ASSOCIATE 3937 2440 (of course, these examples capture information that otherwise might be captured by a connectivity (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
| (...) True, but I feel this part might fall under Larry's "terribly unwieldy" escape clause. Even if he doesn't think so. (...) It's arguable at this point, but the long-term general idea is that you can do whatever you want with your original file, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
