Subject:
|
Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 22:32:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
427 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Robert M. Rodinsky writes:
> I would like to object on the strongest terms possible the "Modified part
> description" of the part 2916.dat.
The flip side of this arguement is that while it's only use may not be just
for trains, the primary use is for trains. By your argument all the parts
with the word Technic and Minifig in the title should be renamed as well.
The reason that they haven't is Train, Technic and Minifig are broad enough
groups such that they span multiple themes and their primary usage is as
descibed.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
| (...) Train in my view is a very narrow group. There are a very few parts that belong in it. I would refer you to the PNLTC originated "diagram of train parts" that many train clubs use to discuss how easy it is to actually get started in trains. (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Renaming of 2916.dat
|
| I would like to object on the strongest terms possible the "Modified part description" of the part 2916.dat. This is in keeping with my beliefs on how parts should be named. Please refer to: (URL) is not necessarily a train part. Is this file not my (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
