Subject:
|
Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 19:29:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
376 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes:
> I'd like 2917 and 2916 to be categorized together, since they are often
> used together. But I can guess it's not going to happen.
I would argue that 2917 probably belongs in windscreen or window, I guess?
In an ideal world there would be a way to associate a part with its
"partner" as it were without using naming, there just would be a link
between them somehow. Regardless of their names.
Maybe we can't do that, I dunno. But using naming to denote associativity
seems to be overloading naming and that's typically not a good idea.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Renaming of 2916.dat
|
| (...) True, but I feel this part might fall under Larry's "terribly unwieldy" escape clause. Even if he doesn't think so. (...) It's arguable at this point, but the long-term general idea is that you can do whatever you want with your original file, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
