 | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) One minor thing. L3P's default view that most people are used to is equivalent to -cg30,45,0. I really think the latitude of 30 is preferable to the latitude of 45 for most models. --Travis Cobbs (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
After formal running the MOTM contest for a month, I've becomed concerned with the fairness of the contest. In response to my concerns, I'd like to make the following changes to the rules for MOTM in order to level the playing field. - All (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 30 Dec 2003
|
|
Section Totals 118 certified files. 223 files need admin review. 519 files need more votes. 500 have uncertified subfiles. 151 held files. Total Files: 1,511 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-12-30: 118 / 223 / 519 / 500 / 151 (1,511) 2003-12-22: (...) (21 years ago, 30-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 22 Dec. 2003
|
|
Stats for Unofficial Files 071 certified files. 235 files need admin review. 458 files need more votes. 520 have uncertified subfiles. 157 held files. Total Files: 1,441 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-12-22: 071 / 235 / 458 / 520 / 157 (1,441) (...) (21 years ago, 23-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report - 15 Dec. 2003
|
|
Sorry, not quite awake yet. Today's the fifteenth; Wednesday will be the seventeenth... :P ~~~ (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 17 Dec. 2003
|
|
Stats for Unofficial Files 063 certified files. 238 files need admin review. 447 files need more votes. 522 have uncertified subfiles. 157 held files. Total Files: 1,457 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-12-17: 063 / 238 / 447 / 522 / 157 (1,457) (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Numbers Report - 10 December 2003
|
|
(...) Ya but this one is a good direction.. more certified, less need review, less need more votes. The next parts update should be a nice one! (...) (21 years ago, 11-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 10 December 2003
|
|
It keeps growing... and growing... and growing... ;-) Stats for Unofficial Files 365 certified files. 224 files need admin review. 402 files need more votes. 558 have uncertified subfiles. 174 held files. Total Files: 1,723 Comparison with Prev. (...) (21 years ago, 10-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) Thanks. It works now. A (21 years ago, 8-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) You have to give the system some time for your newly registered account to be filtered throughout all the site's modules. Log out, wait 30 minutes, log in, and try again. You should now be able to vote. -Orion (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) I'd love to vote, and after registering, receiving my password, and for all appearances logging in correctly I get the following message when I select the 'vote for a model/scene' links : "Incorrect User ID or Password, or your account has (...) (21 years ago, 7-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) I've created a Current Month's Contest gallery for MOTM and SOTM. You can link to them at: (URL) (21 years ago, 3-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Miguel Agullo wrote: Maybe it's worth creating voting and (...) Also for those who either can't (e.g. under 13) or won't create a user account. If the contest is meant to draw in people to the great possiblilities of (...) (21 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - December 1st, 2003
|
|
Stats for Unofficial Files 301 certified files. 250 files need admin review. 453 files need more votes. 503 have uncertified subfiles. 133 held files. Total Files: 1,640 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-12-01: 301 / 250 / 453 / 503 / 133 (1,640) (...) (21 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
Hi Orion, Thanks for bringing this back!! If I may offer a suggestion, I think it's ... cruel ;?) to not let users look at the images again once they've voted. Maybe it's worth creating voting and non-voting galleries or offer some other solution. (...) (21 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) by the end of the week. -Orion (21 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: MOTM / SOTM Voting For December Is Now Open
|
|
(...) being connected by slow modem? That page takes *time* to load! -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: filtering the PT's queue ???
|
|
(...) This type of "integrate my data" request won't go anywhere until after we've changed the PT to use the general site's user authentication. We've got one outstanding issue with the pnauth.cgi test script, and that is your (Franklin's) (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | filtering the PT's queue ???
|
|
(...) Steve, What's the status on this? I've been trying to do some last-minute reviews (to help pad out the impending LCAD release ;) but I've reached the point of diminishing returns (many of the files listed in the queue are ones that I've (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 24 November 2003
|
|
Section Totals 233 certified files. 286 files need admin review. 435 files need more votes. 530 have uncertified subfiles. 141 held files. Total Files: 1,625 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2003-11-24: 233 / 286 / 435 / 530 / 141 (1,625) 2001-11-17: (...) (21 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the PT
|
|
(...) I disagree with this idea. Fixed parts can have subtle changes to them that may affect the parent part. In other words, part fixes are essentially new parts meant to replace the old parts. -Orion (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the PT
|
|
(...) I can see where you are coming from on this and do sympathise. If I were doing the coding, I'd have difficulty in justifying spending the time needed to add this extra level of complexity to the PT, when what we are seeing is a _relatively_ (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) Oooooooohhhhh... I *really* like this one... >;) (...) Interesting. (...) Make this an **option**, and I'd like it... (...) Yessssssss... Thanks, Franklin (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the PT
|
|
I thought of another one, something I *know* I've mentioned before (in various discussions w/ Steve, off-line as well as here on LUGNet)... If a primitive or subfile that has *already* been released (i.e., the file is an **OFFICIAL** file), you (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) Sorry, Orion, but I wouldn't use this. If I want to communicate privately with someone, I'll use e-mail. If I don't have his e-mail address, or if I want to post a public, LEGO-related message, I'll use LUGNet. FWIW, I already have ~100kb of (...) (21 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) That is a definite snag. Any chance that function can be enhanced to include actual emailings? But still, there are times when direct messaging-links on the PT would be very handy. Steve (21 years ago, 20-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) How'd I forget that? I've even used the Scan in the past. Certainly easier than the Find function of a web browser. Could we add the file scan to the toolbar, next to the lookup box? Or better (IMO), replace the file name lookup box with a (...) (21 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) How'd I forget that? I've even used the Scan in the past. Certainly easier than the Find function of a web browser. Could we add the file scan to the toolbar, next to the lookup box? Or better (IMO), replace the file name lookup box with a (...) (21 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) This already exists. It's called File Scan and is located on the PT Tools page. -Orion (21 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) How about a search function, similar to the one on PartsRef? Enter a term, and the search engine checks the file names, part names, CATEGORY statements, and KEYWORDS statements for matches. The current PT search function is file name only. (...) (21 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) This would definitely be a move in the wrong direction, unless there also continued to be an option to continue to see the whole list on one page. Quite aside from the hassle of having to page through material, the Parts Tracker is where (...) (21 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) Actually this already exists in a modified form on the LDraw website. Since all the members of the PT are also members of the LDraw website the use of the Private Message system. The snag is that you have to visit the Main Ldraw site to see if (...) (21 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) A couple more, with some overlap. - Add a checkbox to the submit & review pages, to flag an item as needing admin attention. - Add a function to send email to other PT users, without exposing other users addresses. Need this both as a stand (...) (21 years ago, 19-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Numbers Report - 17 November 2003
|
|
Section Totals 213 certified files. 298 files need admin review. 433 files need more votes. 527 have uncertified subfiles. 147 held files. Total Files: 1,618 Comparison with Prev. Report: 2001-11-17: 213 / 298 / 433 / 527 / 147 (1,618) 2003-11-10: (...) (21 years ago, 17-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) But it *is* already optional (in most any browser): Right click and select 'open in new window'. -- Anders Isaksson, Sweden BlockCAD: (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 14-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) Or, as an alternative to right-clicking, you can also drag'n'drop part-links to a second browser window. Assuming you have enough space on your screen. For me, dragging tends to be easier to remember dragging than right-clicking. Steve (21 years ago, 14-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) Well, how about making it optional then? So the user can choose whether they want the part to be displayed in the same window or load in a different window. I usualy try and click them to load in a different window, but it is easy to forget (...) (21 years ago, 14-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) thx orion for pointing this out. In fact I've got just submit-priviledges, never ever asked for a reviewer status and won't do it in the future ;-) w. (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) As a rare PT user, I agree. I despise pop-up navigation, or auto-launching of new windows. I should control that, not the page. -Tim (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Improving the Parts Tracker experience
|
|
(...) Please, please, please don't do that. If users want to open the link in a new window (or even better, tabs), they can do it themselves - on modern browsers, middle clicking on a link usually does it. Otherwise, right click on the link, and (...) (21 years ago, 13-Nov-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
