Results 5801 – 5820 of 7032.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) Not contacting them is a simpler short-term solution. And it's one that is often used. I haven't asked them about the 2x3 brick icon used by LDAO, both as the program icon, and on the LDAO homepage. But calling inaction a "wiser solution" is (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| (...) I'm not sure how well that image would work as a small icon. But it would be cool. As long as it was a color other than red, it would probably be OK. A plain wireframe brick would be good as a logo, as well. Particularly if it did the (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| So, why not change it to blue or yellow or any other color. That way we keep the brick, but let Lego keep their red 2xN bricks. Would this work?? I'd personally prefer the red, but if we want to avoid any problems with the red 2xN brick use changing (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [LDAO] New beta version available
|
| (...) Hmm. That sounds like it's situational, not data-dependent. IOW, something you did earlier caused a condition where the inliner messed up. Yuck. (...) Yes, the Inliner (the one separate from the editors) does a standard LDraw-search for a (...) (25 years ago, 26-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
| (...) There are parts in l3go and mabie even in lgeo that are not in ldraw yet. I think that before a merge of lgeo and l3go is done then the l3go parts not in ldraw should be done in ldraw.That way there would be nothing in the combined library (...) (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37bd7e8a.724234...net.com... (...) But we could design our own keyboard tile (w/ all the letters even) and a computer screen w/ a 2X3 brick on it! But you'd still have the problem with (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37bd5e73.642071...net.com... (...) What about the brick fading from outline to raytrace as the logo. That seems to me different enough from the LEGO uses of bricks, and it is certainly (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: POV-RAY question
|
| (...) In POV Ray, choose "Render" > "Edit Settings/Render" In the "Command line options" box, type: +Lc:\ldraw\lgeo or whatever the correct path is. You can add more than one path to look in, for example if you want to use Anton Raves' (...) (25 years ago, 24-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.168)
|
|
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
| (...) "Leveraging the LDraw knowledge-base" :p (...) Isn't that something? I think it would make much more sense if everyone built their library using some obscure, *nix-based (that's a bit redundant) raytracing program. Steve (25 years ago, 15-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.167)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.167)
|
|
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
| (...) Gee, hath my memory deceived me? Maybe it WAS 0.83 source I wanted (I think I had 0.75 source). Carsten wasn't interested, I was. I wanted to at least bring the functionality of BriCAD (as opposed to btopia) to Windows, and perhaps build it (...) (25 years ago, 21-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.167)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.167)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.167)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Update
|
| Tim: The new article on MLCad is good. I like the linking graphics, but Todd is correct in pointing out the potential problem. Since we can be sure TLG will see the site soon (if they haven't been there yet), we can just as well be polite and ask (...) (25 years ago, 20-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.publish)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.167)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
