Subject:
|
Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 15 Aug 1999 21:43:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1058 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999 07:39:32 GMT, Paul Gyugyi <paul@gyugyi.com> wrote:
> Bram Lambrecht wrote:
> > How do the library authors feel about this? If I remember correctly,
> > Lars had a combined LGEO-L3P in mind originally, but Lutz was reluctant.
> > I have no idea how Anton or Paul feel.
>
> I don't care, really. I'm still wondering why we needed those newfangled
> L*P tools, anyways. :)
"Leveraging the LDraw knowledge-base" :p
> I've always been amused at how everyone who
> creates a part library uses a totally wron^H^H^H^Hdifferent
> coordinate system and names the pieces totally differently.
Isn't that something? I think it would make much more sense if everyone
built their library using some obscure, *nix-based (that's a bit redundant)
raytracing program.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
| (...) I don't care, really. I'm still wondering why we needed those newfangled L*P tools, anyways. :) I've always been amused at how everyone who creates a part library uses a totally wron^H^H^H^Hdifferent coordinate system and names the pieces (...) (25 years ago, 14-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
146 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
