|
 | | Re: Resolution
|
| (...) Hi Steve-- Thanks for taking the time to answer so thoroughly. All I can say is that I'm glad I'm not modelling official elements! Clone brands have quite a few odd cones, arcs, and domes that just don't fit the official primitives, and if I (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.838)
|
|
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
| (...) Cool. Hmm, which to choose... It makes less work for me doing it the mailing list way, because of the incoming gateway translations at the e-mail level. What do we want to call it here? lugnet.cad.ldraw-tech? lugnet.cad.ldraw.tech? --Todd (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.838)
|
|
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) This is new? Only the committee and people who are eligable for membership in the LSC can vote? I thought we were defining the general membership in LDraw.org so that everyone can vote? I think this paragraph should say: LDraw.org Members will (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.838)
|
|
| | Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
| (...) currently, since there is no formal organization (and we're starting to push for one, woo!), there really isn't an authority issue. There's only the ability. If Steve decides he's turning off the parts tracker, he can. If you (Tim) decide to (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.838)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.838)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| | Re: The big question
|
| (...) Right. While I don't presume to know what he would do, I see the need for organizing in order to more effectively develop and promote the hobby. I've talked with Don Jessiman (his father) several times off and on over the last couple years (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| | LPub 2.2.0.0 Available
|
| In the previous version of LPub I released some prototype new features for creating "callout" images, which are images of small assembly contruction, all tiled together into a single image, like this: (URL) this (URL) above callout image generation (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.inst)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| | Re: LPub open source?
|
| (...) Well, I don't have borland C++ and I'm not sure if you'd consider it helpful, but if you were to open the source there are some things I suspect I would do. I'd probably try to build as much as possible with gcc. Then I might try to replicate (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) I think both LDraw.org and the community at large would benefit from it being mirrored. And another beauty of mirroring an archive like this is that it's so easy to set up that even if there's not a perceived burning need for it, the long-term (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| | Re: Mac Brick CAD (MBC)
|
| (...) MBC doesn't know where your LDRAW directory is, so you are only seeing the parts that are internal to MBC. Get the LDRAW directory like James said, then throw away all of your preference files that have anything to do with LDRAWing (...) (21 years ago, 23-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) there are reasons why I put stress on a restriction. (URL) took me almost a year to get a deeper understanding of the stuff I was dealing with and feel comfortable with cond. line, BFC, bad vertex sequences and the like. 'til one hasn't (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) That statement (aside from the ad-hoc addition) was in Version 0.6, the first version I posted publicly. I found it in my local text file, as well as in the post here: (URL) strongly in favor of at least restricting the vote to only those (...) (21 years ago, 5-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| | Parts Tracker Status
|
| The Parts Tracker is back online and open for business! The URL is the same as always, (URL). There are two outstanding issues that we'll hopefully be able to resolve soon: 1. Because of differences in the nature of the server, submissions and (...) (21 years ago, 8-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !!
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) Great, thanks! Ultimately, the means of communication should be up to the elected LSC members to decide for themselves. If I had my say, I like the idea of a mailing list on LDraw.org, which posts messages automatically to a LUGNET group for (...) (21 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| | Re: LSC Proposal 0.99
|
| (...) Both, but moreso that only LSC-eligable. I'd rather the LSC be selected by people who are familiar with the other programmers and potential members, as well as the issues the LSC will be dealing with. I think this is a very important concern, (...) (21 years ago, 6-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.837)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.836)
|
