|
 | | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) Ok. (...) I can accept this. There are several possible verification systems. I think we should use several, to make it easy for as many people as possible. Ultimately though, the onus should be on the applicant to prove his/her identity, (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) I'd lean towards is. I'm more inclined to trust people than not to trust people, then again, that might be my weakness. (...) Yeah, sorry. One person I know signed up twice cause he thought it had something to do with news posting. Not a (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) In a scenario where multiple mechanisms are on offer, you yourself might not ever need to use it, as you'd have several other paths available. But more importantly, until we've a consensus on what level of validation is appropriate, I'd rather (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) OK, your feelings are noted, at least by me, but I do think we haven't gotten all the possibilities developed yet. I tend to personally favor not working TOO hard to antispoof, but I'll stand by what I said, you may be inadvertantly stifling (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) The idea of personally identifiable information is indeed a sensitive one, and I recognize that. In fact, I'm a privacy freak myself - when it comes to commercial entities. The reason I included it in the recap/call for more brainstorming is (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) The above set sounds OK to me. (...) I think you've found a good balance by the set above. Todd has mentioned a system for cross-checking IDs for uniqueness elsewhere in this thread, which I think is important to be able to claim an off-site (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| | LPub 2.1.0.7 Released
|
| Hi All, I only posted this to announce, but thought wiser. I've released LPub 2.1.0.7 for general use. It contains a few new minor features, but more importantly there are fixes to the combination of rotation steps and buffer exchange, as well as (...) (22 years ago, 7-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.inst)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) OK, would that be sufficient? Only LUGNET(tm) members can be members? Is that too exclusionary? It's certainly simple enough. If it IS too exclusionary, what scheme would you suggest for those potential members who are not LUGNET members? (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) OK, so you favor requireing a drivers license or something else more stringent then? Or restricting it to just LUGNET members only? or what? And you're OK if you go to 0 votes if any two of these are discovered to be the same when probed? What (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| | Re: LSC Draft Proposal Version 0.7
|
| (...) I agree. That's what I meant when I said the LSC is the first step twards an official LDraw.org body. The 4+1 are not really LDraw.org - they act in what they believe is it's best interest, but so do quite a few other people, who are just as (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) my only problem, is since I know what "reasonable care" is, it's really not much. (...) I'm not sure I believe in "privacy provisions" - since it's in lawyer talk, it's usual not possible for the average user to actually know what they say - I (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) I'm confused. I find your conflicting statements very conflicting. I think it's time to call the question. What level of validation do you (and Jenn, for that matter, since she voiced a negative with no positive offered) think we need? What (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.840)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.839)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.839)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| (...) That's okay. I recognized that pretty quickly. Organizations need long term visions as well as short term. Hopefully the short term solution easily transitions into the long term stable solution. Otherwise, we may be seeing this same sort of (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.839)
|
|
| | Re: mailing list linkage
|
| (...) Oh, that's a good point. Yes, it's a bit long, but as Steve points out, it's a relatively low-interest group. Putting it as .ldraw.tech instead of .ldraw-tech also makes it cleaner if other lists (such as, say, Tim's ldraw-siggraph list) (...) (21 years ago, 17-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.839)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.839)
|
|
| | Re: Callout generation
|
| (...) I recall some one (Dutch too) who started a Postscript project. It was about converting the LDraw format directly to PS. I asked this way back: (URL) (december 10 1999 :-) I got no reply... But then, Guido Heunen replied to another thread: (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.839)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| Quoting Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com>: (...) I wasn't brainstorming. I was expressing my opinion. I was expressing it as strongly as I thought was appropriate given how strongly I felt about it. I am not only concerned with myself about (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.839)
|
