|
| |
|  
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
 | | The big question
|
| No, I'm not getting married. ;-) All of this LDraw standards and organization talk has gotten me thinking...about LDraw.org and it's mission, if you will. So I'd like to throw out a question: What do you think LDraw.org's role is in the LDraw/LEGO (...) (21 years ago, 26-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) [snip everything else, good stuff] I think I wasn't clear enough. As you read it, I don't agree either. I meant - this proposal is yet another catalyst to the issue of further organizing and defining LDraw.org. It isn't the LSC's job, but the (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) hmm ... probably it's due to a non-proper knowledge of the english language but now I'm even more confused! as far as I understand we have Ldraw members, which are not part of the community, community members which are not Ldraw members, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| | LTrax Commands (was: Calling all Meta-commands)
|
| I have some LTrax commands. (LTrax is an LDraw compatible "Track Designer") The LTrax are not 'official' LCad commands, but I wish to reserve the keyword. 0 LTrax Position <x y z> 0 LTrax Angle <v> [Degs*] 0 LTrax Object 9Volts\Straight.txt** 0 (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
| (...) I agree. (...) Nit: we've already *got* an LDraw file format spec. Next item! (...) 'Control' is heavy-handed for my tastes. 'Support', 'endorse', 'coordinate' are all better. All a standards body could do is manage the documentation, and (...) (22 years ago, 21-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| | Re: Ldraw.Org Spec 1.0.0 Page
|
| (...) I know I didn't recall LDraw II until a couple months ago when you brought it up to me. My guess is at least the newer members in the community aren't too familiar with it either. Would you mind posting a link for everyone? Maybe I can throw (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| | Re: Calling all Meta-commands
|
| (...) Kevin & Travis - These are very good points. As a non-programmer, but someone who has a general knowledge of the LDraw file format, I think it is a good idea to separate comments from meta-commands. Also, talk of a standards body is a good (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| | LDraw Viewer 0.5 bugs
|
| Andrew, I noticed a few problems when I went to play with LDV 0.5. Start LDV Click cancel at initial open model dialog Select "New" LDV crashes Start LDV open a model using initial open model dialog Select "New" LDV crashes Start LDV Click cancel at (...) (22 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) You're mostly right. I suppose the proposal/message wasn't clear enough (and this is the part I was afraid of it not being clear enough in, so I tried to disclaim it). A couple years ago, the four of us posted this message: (URL) - sometime (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| | Re: Elections and Membership in ldraw.org
|
| In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) This last suggestion sounds like having a membership packet. I like the idea of having a membership package, possibly packaged with a CD of current LDraw editors, tools, library, (...) (21 years ago, 28-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| | Re: Ldraw.Org Spec 1.0.0 Page
|
| (...) I'm not sure about the 'into one document' part, but I'll agree with the rest. More basically, we've got a number of different 'flavors' of the LDraw language floating around. I think it would be most useful to have one or more documents that (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
|
| |
|
ldraw
(score: 0.843)
|
