Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:07:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
869 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague writes:
> > > LDraw.org Membership
> > > --------------------
> > > Defined, opt-in group of LDraw community participants who will have the
> > > right to vote on resolutions put forward by the LDraw.org Leadership.
> >
> > I had no problems understanding the difference between the Ldraw.org
> > Leadership and LSC membership and what's all about, although not being a
> > native speaker ;-), but I do not understand who these Ldraw.org members are?
> > Do THEY need to meet any requirements (part author, reviewer, programmer) in
> > order to elect the LSC members or is everyone invited?
>
> They are a group that formed after James' death, to keep LDraw and its
> community alive in honor of James, and because of the value of James'
> inventions.
>
> >
> > > LDraw.org Members will be eligible to vote to ratify the document
> > > if they themselves meet the requirements for membership in the LSC.
>
> I'm not sure this is a good idea. I think that only the LSC folks get to
> vote. If LDraw.org folks are LSC members, then they can vote, otherwise not.
> I could see potential issues with a mechanism outlined above. It empowers
> LDraw.org members to vote, even though the community has not explicitly said
> they can vote.
>
> I guess I'm officially objecting to the above part of the specification.
hmm ... probably it's due to a non-proper knowledge of the english language
but now I'm even more confused! as far as I understand we have Ldraw
members, which are not part of the community, community members which are
not Ldraw members, people who may contribute with parts or progs, but do not
post on lugnet and aren't related to ldraw and last but not least the usual
bunch of lurkers (hi guys ;-) to make it short: whom of these will elect the
LSC members (LDraw 1.0.0 doc?) and which requirements will they have to meet?
> Kevin
w.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) Everyone who is interested in LDraw related stuff is part of the community. The LDraw community has some official organizations like LDraw.org and soon to be the LSC. It is my understanding that anyone who wants to vote for the nominees (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) formats. (...) ... (...) I interpret the "set in stone" statement to refer to the language as defined in 027 version of LDraw/LEdit. It is my belief that all the nuances (nucances :^) you mentioned should be described in the 0.27 document. The (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
