Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:36:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
907 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Kevin L. Clague writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Willy Tschager writes:
> > hmm ... probably it's due to a non-proper knowledge of the english language
> > but now I'm even more confused! as far as I understand we have Ldraw
> > members, which are not part of the community, community members which are
> > not Ldraw members, people who may contribute with parts or progs, but do not
> > post on lugnet and aren't related to ldraw and last but not least the usual
> > bunch of lurkers (hi guys ;-) to make it short: whom of these will elect the
> > LSC members (LDraw 1.0.0 doc?) and which requirements will they have to meet?
>
> Everyone who is interested in LDraw related stuff is part of the community.
Yep. Steve and I have talked before about a voting mechanism. Basically,
anyone who signed up to vote can vote. This mechanism hasn't been set up
yet, but it can be discussed and set up in the relative near future -
according to the proposal, before the first LSC vote, I think...
> The LDraw community has some official organizations like LDraw.org and soon to
> be the LSC.
The LSC should be a subcommittee within LDraw.org. For the immediate, a
subcommittee of the 4+1/steering committee, in the future, a subcommittee of
the elected steering committee (once the details are worked out for that and
it's in place). BUT - the LSC is responsible for standards, not the
over-arching steering group, the steering committee can't influence
standards based on their position guiding the org.
> It is my understanding that anyone who wants to vote for the
> nominees (including lurkers) will be able to vote. Only the nominees must meet
> requirements (which are indended to make sure the LSC is a technical body, not
> political.)
Right. The steering group is by nature political, and the LSC should be by
nature technical, not political.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I'm sorry for the confusion here - Lar corrected me offline on the definition of 'subcommittee' (which technically typically means members drawn from the parent body [1], not the intent here). I didn't mean to imply that the 4+1/steering (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) Everyone who is interested in LDraw related stuff is part of the community. The LDraw community has some official organizations like LDraw.org and soon to be the LSC. It is my understanding that anyone who wants to vote for the nominees (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
