Subject:
|
Re: Ldraw.Org Spec 1.0.0 Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 May 2003 22:32:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1312 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Steve Bliss writes:
> Any changes that would essentially break the existing language would be
> a huge change in direction, and should be in yet another document
> (2.0.0?). With the work Jacob did on LDraw II some years ago, we've
> already got a start on such a document.
I know I didn't recall LDraw II until a couple months ago when you brought
it up to me. My guess is at least the newer members in the community aren't
too familiar with it either. Would you mind posting a link for everyone?
Maybe I can throw it (in it's current formatting) under the specs section of
LDraw.org, as a 'work in progress.'
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Ldraw.Org Spec 1.0.0 Page
|
| (...) I'm not sure about the 'into one document' part, but I'll agree with the rest. More basically, we've got a number of different 'flavors' of the LDraw language floating around. I think it would be most useful to have one or more documents that (...) (21 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
