Subject:
|
Re: Ldraw.Org Spec 1.0.0 Page
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 May 2003 00:26:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1013 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Tim Courtney writes:
> In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky writes:
> > Since I'm tired of people saying 'I don't like this format' or 'Could please
> > post in this other format' or 'I hate MS so can you make it plain text', etc...
> >
> > I made a Lugnet page for the file format.
> >
> > http://www.lugnet.com/~1776/
> >
> > Read it over. Note your suggestions. I'm still working on this page so
> > visit often to see the progress
>
> Hi Orion -
> Thanks for getting this up. I have a couple observations/questions...
>
> You incorporate the original LDraw spec in here (which should be included),
> but will we draw a distinction between original language LDraw/LEdit will
> recognize (closed), and extensions (meta-commands) which go beyond that
> (including MPD)?
>
> I could have gotten the wrong impression originally from standards
> discussions, BUT, I was assuming we'd have a doc for 0.2.7 (which is only
> LDraw/LEdit language), 1.0.0 (which is new meta-commands including MPD),
> etc... Do you agree or disagree with this approach? Anyone else? Why? (for
> either case)
>
> Just trying to get discussion going :-) I think it's a good thing that at
> the same time we're resolving issues surrounding the formation of the LSC,
> people are also working on the documents which will be ratified as standards
> - a true sign of progress here :-)
>
> Great work!
>
> -Tim
Alright here's the deal.
The ultimate aim of the LSC is to compile and consolidate all of the LDraw
related file format definitions into one document (1.0.0) and then, once the
initial work is done, solicit ideas to further extend or modify the file format.
That said, having tow separate documents, 1.0.0 for meta commands which is
modifiable by the LSC and 0.2.7 for the LDraw/LEdit program which is fixed,
would not allow the LSC to, say, add a linetype for polygons or modify the
way we define colors. Have one large document (or several small linked
documents) would allow us to move forward much easier.
-Orion
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Ldraw.Org Spec 1.0.0 Page
|
| (...) I'm not sure about the 'into one document' part, but I'll agree with the rest. More basically, we've got a number of different 'flavors' of the LDraw language floating around. I think it would be most useful to have one or more documents that (...) (22 years ago, 1-May-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Ldraw.Org Spec 1.0.0 Page
|
| (...) Hi Orion - Thanks for getting this up. I have a couple observations/questions... You incorporate the original LDraw spec in here (which should be included), but will we draw a distinction between original language LDraw/LEdit will recognize (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
