To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / Search Results: Stickers in LDraw
 Results 4201 – 4220 of 7032.
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
 
(...) OK. I took care of these two very minor issues. ;) I won't vouch for the quality of any of the linked data, though! The first part I pulled down had a half-dozen lines with syntax errors. :O Remember, that URL is (URL) Steve (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
 
OK, you asked for it, and now you've got it. I've preposted an "Unofficial Update" page at: (URL) There are no links to this page yet, so it's not officially unofficially released. Anyway, take a look, tell me what you think. The good news: I (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)  
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: New Feature Article - Progress in the LDraw Community...
 
"Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GCq40n.9nB@lugnet.com... (...) Yep, hopefully. I wrote it to do that, and to inform everyone of what has happened and what we're planning on doing. (...) Hey - no problem! I love what (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
 
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:92sfftk3sqrfi3d...4ax.com... (...) name - (...) to (...) 'Unofficial' to (...) I thought it might be something like that. (...) keep a (...) The Unofficial is going to make it hard to find (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: New Feature Article - Progress in the LDraw Community...
 
Nice to see a photo of some people who post here and have a lot to do with LDraw. (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Winner! May 2001 ldraw.org MOTM competition
 
A *very* interesting race this time. Right from the start, the truck and the space station took the lead. And they swapped that lead several times. Then the truck started to pull ahead slightly..... Looking like a solid front-runner.... But as fate (...) (23 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Problems with reaching www.ldraw.org
 
Several people have in the last year reported problems with getting access to www.ldraw.org. The reason for this problem appears to be that the default "time-to-live" (TTL) for TCP packets is too low. I have now recieved confirmation that this is (...) (23 years ago, 30-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: Proposal
 
"Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GCtx8C.8C3@lugnet.com... (...) Cool. I'd prefer the primary file extension to reflect the 'LDraw' name - 'ldr.' Some further discussion may be in order about DAT files having more than (...) (23 years ago, 4-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Proposal
 
I've got a bit of a problem with the LDraw derived software. I love the tools I use. My problem is with the unfortunate choice of filename extension. When LDraw/LEdit were written, it didn't really matter much. However, nowadays file (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: New Feature Article - Progress in the LDraw Community...
 
Tim, Your article is well written and will hopefully quell some of the negative noise being made out there. Thank you for including LDMC, also. James and I are doing what we can to make LDMC a force to be reckoned with. Your help has been (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: May 2001 ldraw.org MOTM voting
 
"I" didn't do that. According to the email that John Miller sent me, he had converted the model to DXF and imported into Bryce 4 for rendering. What exactly he converted from, or what he used to convert with, he did not specify. -- Terry K -- (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  May 2001 ldraw.org MOTM voting
 
Here goes, Voting is up an running for the May MOTM. (URL) models have been rendered in Bryce. Bryce looks a little different from POV-Ray - sort of another philosophy on the idea of "photo-realistic". Have fun, -- Terry K -- (23 years ago, 25-Apr-01, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: May 2001 ldraw.org MOTM voting
 
hmm allright. thanks -- And they said 'Computers will never be in general use' "Terry K" <legoverse@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:GCJAG3.MM0@lugnet.com... (...) had (...) not (...) another (...) files (...) is (...) other (...) (23 years ago, 29-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: Proposal
 
(...) I think we should try to keep the 8.3 filename convention from DOS because of ldraw/ledit. We can just use mpd as someone suggested. (...) Sounds like an Apple guy talking :) Leonardo (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
(...) It seems to me that LDraw has become a project of secrecy and inside work. When did it stop being an "open" project? When did discussions concerning LDraw cease to be done in the open? I think I missed this. I realize that whoever work with (...) (23 years ago, 1-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: Proposal
 
(...) I think we should settle for mpd. Let's not bring another extention into this to cause even more confusion. One can always use .mpd on an LDraw file, even if it does not contain any "FILE" keywords, right? So there are no problems related to (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: Proposal
 
(...) You and Fredrik are both correct on this, of course. And most tools will accept any extension on files, so if you have a DAT model named whatever.foo, you can still render it in LDraw, LDLite or L3Lab (for example). Steve (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.234)

  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
HeeHeee! I have great faith in Tim that one day LDraw will become an open project, but I don't think it has ever been one in the past! :) As soon as the parts library is opened up, I promise I'll check it all into Sourceforge.org, so one can use (...) (23 years ago, 2-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.233)

  Re: LDraw meeting at Brickfest 2001 - Interest?
 
(...) ...I really think the demos aspect would be popular and fun. I'm hoping maybe we can settle into one of the classrooms upstairs and play/work in little groups on assorted concepts involved (I personally am interested in POVing LCAD stuff). I (...) (23 years ago, 26-Apr-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad, lugnet.events.brickfest)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.233)

  Re: We need an update NOW (Was: Parts Update?)
 
(...) I'll go look up the discussion. I'm just getting back into the swing of things. I think CVS would be a great way of distributing the parts. There's clearly some managment tools needed to help with organizing the submissions and reviews of new (...) (23 years ago, 3-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

ldraw
(score: 0.233)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR